These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17956565)

  • 1. A model study on flapless implant placement by clinicians with a different experience level in implant surgery.
    Van de Velde T; Glor F; De Bruyn H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 17956565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery versus conventional implants in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Cannizzaro G; Leone M; Consolo U; Ferri V; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):867-75. PubMed ID: 19014156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An alternative method for flapless implant placement and an immediate provisional crown: a case report.
    Turkyilmaz I; Suarez JC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):89-95. PubMed ID: 19430631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.
    Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guidelines for flapless surgery.
    Sclar AG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7 Suppl 1):20-32. PubMed ID: 17586346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A preliminary report of patients treated with early loaded implants using computerized tomography-guided surgical stents: flapless versus conventional flapped surgery.
    Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Yilmaz B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 34(11):835-40. PubMed ID: 17919250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in the dog: flap versus flapless surgery.
    Blanco J; Nuñez V; Aracil L; Muñoz F; Ramos I
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 35(7):640-8. PubMed ID: 18422696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of two implant techniques on patient-based outcome measures: a report of flapless vs. conventional flapped implant placement.
    Lindeboom JA; van Wijk AJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Apr; 21(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 20128828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
    Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flapless implant surgery: an experimental study.
    Jeong SM; Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jung JH; Lee HJ; Lee SH; Engelke W
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jul; 104(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 17376716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study.
    Fortin T; Bosson JL; Coudert JL; Isidori M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):886-93. PubMed ID: 14696665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Buccal bone augmentation around immediate implants with and without flap elevation: a modified approach.
    Covani U; Cornelini R; Barone A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):841-6. PubMed ID: 19014153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study.
    Horwitz J; Zuabi O; Machtei EE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1156-62. PubMed ID: 19519787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CAD/CAM fabrication and clinical application of surgical template and bone model in oral implant surgery.
    Sohmura T; Kusumoto N; Otani T; Yamada S; Wakabayashi K; Yatani H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 19126112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flapless surgery and its effect on dental implant outcomes.
    Brodala N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24 Suppl():118-25. PubMed ID: 19885439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision of flapless implant placement using real-time surgical navigation: a case series.
    Elian N; Jalbout ZN; Classi AJ; Wexler A; Sarment D; Tarnow DP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1123-7. PubMed ID: 19216283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of submerged and nonsubmerged implants placed without flap reflection in the canine mandible.
    Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 May; 105(5):561-5. PubMed ID: 18299237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Navigated flapless transmucosal implant placement in the mandible: a pilot study in 20 patients.
    Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Schicho K; Figl M; Enislidis G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):801-7. PubMed ID: 17974116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.