316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17957249)
1. Ancestral inference and the study of codon bias evolution: implications for molecular evolutionary analyses of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.
Akashi H; Goel P; John A
PLoS One; 2007 Oct; 2(10):e1065. PubMed ID: 17957249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup: frequent parameter fluctuations on the timescale of molecular divergence.
Akashi H; Ko WY; Piao S; John A; Goel P; Lin CF; Vitins AP
Genetics; 2006 Mar; 172(3):1711-26. PubMed ID: 16387879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Codon Usage Selection Can Bias Estimation of the Fraction of Adaptive Amino Acid Fixations.
Matsumoto T; John A; Baeza-Centurion P; Li B; Akashi H
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jun; 33(6):1580-9. PubMed ID: 26873577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster.
Akashi H
Genetics; 1996 Nov; 144(3):1297-307. PubMed ID: 8913769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximum likelihood estimation of ancestral codon usage bias parameters in Drosophila.
Nielsen R; Bauer DuMont VL; Hubisz MJ; Aquadro CF
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):228-35. PubMed ID: 17041152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patterns of polymorphism and divergence from noncoding sequences of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: evidence for nonequilibrium processes.
Kern AD; Begun DJ
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Jan; 22(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 15456897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distinguishing Among Evolutionary Forces Acting on Genome-Wide Base Composition: Computer Simulation Analysis of Approximate Methods for Inferring Site Frequency Spectra of Derived Mutations.
Matsumoto T; Akashi H
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 May; 8(5):1755-1769. PubMed ID: 29588382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction Methods to Infer Nonstationary Patterns of Nucleotide Substitution.
Matsumoto T; Akashi H; Yang Z
Genetics; 2015 Jul; 200(3):873-90. PubMed ID: 25948563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variation in the Intensity of Selection on Codon Bias over Time Causes Contrasting Patterns of Base Composition Evolution in Drosophila.
Jackson BC; Campos JL; Haddrill PR; Charlesworth B; Zeng K
Genome Biol Evol; 2017 Jan; 9(1):102-123. PubMed ID: 28082609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inferring parameters of mutation, selection and demography from patterns of synonymous site evolution in Drosophila.
McVean GA; Vieira J
Genetics; 2001 Jan; 157(1):245-57. PubMed ID: 11139506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Substitution rates in Drosophila nuclear genes: implications for translational selection.
Dunn KA; Bielawski JP; Yang Z
Genetics; 2001 Jan; 157(1):295-305. PubMed ID: 11139510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The evolution of codon preferences in Drosophila: a maximum-likelihood approach to parameter estimation and hypothesis testing.
McVean GA; Vieira J
J Mol Evol; 1999 Jul; 49(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 10368435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ancestral sequence reconstruction in primate mitochondrial DNA: compositional bias and effect on functional inference.
Krishnan NM; Seligmann H; Stewart CB; De Koning AP; Pollock DD
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Oct; 21(10):1871-83. PubMed ID: 15229290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Paleo-demography of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup: application of the maximum likelihood method.
Li YJ; Satta Y; Takahata N
Genes Genet Syst; 1999 Aug; 74(4):117-27. PubMed ID: 10650839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila.
Akashi H; Kliman RM; Eyre-Walker A
Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):49-60. PubMed ID: 9720271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic heterogeneity of background substitutional patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.
Singh ND; Arndt PF; Petrov DA
Genetics; 2005 Feb; 169(2):709-22. PubMed ID: 15520267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hill-Robertson interference is a minor determinant of variations in codon bias across Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes.
Marais G; Piganeau G
Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Sep; 19(9):1399-406. PubMed ID: 12200468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating selection intensity on synonymous codon usage in a nonequilibrium population.
Zeng K; Charlesworth B
Genetics; 2009 Oct; 183(2):651-62, 1SI-23SI. PubMed ID: 19620398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative genomics of mitochondrial DNA in members of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.
Ballard JW
J Mol Evol; 2000 Jul; 51(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 10903372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variable strength of translational selection among 12 Drosophila species.
Heger A; Ponting CP
Genetics; 2007 Nov; 177(3):1337-48. PubMed ID: 18039870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
