These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17958101)

  • 1. Resampling programs for multiway contingency tables with fixed marginal frequency totals.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ; Johnston JE
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Aug; 101(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17958101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiway contingency tables: Monte Carlo resampling probability values for the chi-squared and likelihood-ratio tests.
    Long MA; Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):501-10. PubMed ID: 21117477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysing 2 × 2 contingency tables: which test is best?
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 23294254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exact and resampling probability values for measures associated with ordered r by c contingency tables.
    Berry KJ; Johnston JE; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Aug; 99(1):231-8. PubMed ID: 17037473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An implicit enumeration method for an exact test of weighted kappa.
    Brusco MJ; Stahl S; Steinley D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):439-52. PubMed ID: 17650363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Categorical independence tests for large sparse r-way contingency tables.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Oct; 95(2):606-10. PubMed ID: 12434857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exact goodness-of-fit tests for unordered equiprobable categories.
    Berry KJ; Johnston JE; Mielke PW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Jun; 98(3 Pt 1):909-19. PubMed ID: 15209307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stuart's tau measure of effect size for ordinal variables: some methodological considerations.
    Berry KJ; Johnston JE; Zahran S; Mielke PW
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1144-8. PubMed ID: 19897822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A measure of effect size for r x c contingency tables.
    Berry KJ; Johnston JE; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Aug; 99(1):251-6. PubMed ID: 17037476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recommended tests for association in 2 x 2 tables.
    Lydersen S; Fagerland MW; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1159-75. PubMed ID: 19170020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Goodness-of-fit testing using components based on marginal frequencies of multinomial data.
    Reiser M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):331-60. PubMed ID: 17535483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2 x 2 contingency table: an overview of Fisher's exact test and Yates' correction for continuity.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):43-70. PubMed ID: 7613560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exact and resampling probability values for weighted kappa.
    Berry KJ; Johnston JE; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Apr; 96(2):243-52. PubMed ID: 15941094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of 2 x 2 tables of frequencies: matching test to experimental design.
    Ludbrook J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 37(6):1430-5. PubMed ID: 18710887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resampling probability values for measures of ordinal variation and consensus.
    Berry KJ; Johnston JE; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Jun; 96(3 Pt 1):547-52. PubMed ID: 16050602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resampling permutation probability values for weighted kappa.
    Johnston JE; Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Oct; 103(2):467-75. PubMed ID: 19102472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choice of test for association in small sample unordered r x c tables.
    Lydersen S; Pradhan V; Senchaudhuri P; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4328-43. PubMed ID: 17311220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymptotic log-linear analysis: some cautions concerning sparse frequency tables.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ; Johnston JE
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Feb; 94(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15077743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables.
    Cai L; Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Thissen D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):173-94. PubMed ID: 16709285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.