These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Sensitivity of Fisher's exact test to minor perturbations in 2 x 2 contingency tables. Dupont WD Stat Med; 1986; 5(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 3823670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How to analyze many contingency tables simultaneously in genetic association studies. Dickhaus T; Straßburger K; Schunk D; Morcillo-Suarez C; Illig T; Navarro A Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Jul; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 22850061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. On measures of agreement calculated from contingency tables with categories defined by the empirical quantiles of the marginal distributions. Borkowf CB; Gail MH Am J Epidemiol; 1997 Sep; 146(6):520-6. PubMed ID: 9290513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Two-tailed significance tests for 2 × 2 contingency tables: What is the alternative? Prescott RJ Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(22):4264-4269. PubMed ID: 31264237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multiway frequency analysis for experimental psychologists. Vokey JR Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 57(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 14596481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. USP: an independence test that improves on Pearson's chi-squared and the Berrett TB; Samworth RJ Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 Dec; 477(2256):20210549. PubMed ID: 35153605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Conditional and Unconditional Tests (and Sample Size) Based on Multiple Comparisons for Stratified 2 × 2 Tables. Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I; Álvarez Hernández M Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():147038. PubMed ID: 26075012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Resampling probability values for differences between two independent indices of ordinal variation and consensus. Johnston JE; Berry KJ; Mielke PW Psychol Rep; 2006 Jun; 98(3):865-9. PubMed ID: 16933687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The score test for independence in R x C contingency tables with missing data. Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):751-62. PubMed ID: 8672711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The quantification of Simpson's paradox and other contributions to contingency table theory. Teuscher F PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0262502. PubMed ID: 35202396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reinventing the Contingency Wheel: Scalable Visual Analytics of Large Categorical Data. Alsallakh B; Aigner W; Miksch S; Groller ME IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Dec; 18(12):2849-58. PubMed ID: 26357194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fixed-distance latent class models for the analysis of sets of two-way contingency tables. Formann AK Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):511-21. PubMed ID: 8369385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Extending the CLAST sequential rule to one-way ANOVA under group sampling. Ximénez C; Revuelta J Behav Res Methods; 2007 Feb; 39(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 17552475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An enhanced branch-and-bound algorithm for a partitioning problem. Brusco MJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):83-92. PubMed ID: 12803823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Extension of Fisher's exact test to 2-by-k contingency tables: a computer program in BASIC. Fung KP; Lee J Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1989 Mar; 28(3):195-6. PubMed ID: 2702812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combining probability values from independent permutation tests: a discrete analog of Fisher's classical method. Mielke PW; Johnston JE; Berry KJ Psychol Rep; 2004 Oct; 95(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 15587207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. On the Existence of Uniformly Most Powerful Bayesian Tests With Application to Non-Central Chi-Squared Tests. Nikooienejad A; Johnson VE Bayesian Anal; 2021 Mar; 16(1):93-109. PubMed ID: 34113418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]