226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17958502)
1. An empirical test of competing theories of hazard-related trust: the case of GM food.
Allum N
Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):935-46. PubMed ID: 17958502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States.
Lang JT; Hallman WK
Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1241-52. PubMed ID: 16297228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs.
Poortinga W; Pidgeon NF
Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 15660605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food?
Poortinga W; Pidgeon NF
Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):199-209. PubMed ID: 15787769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GM foods and the misperception of risk perception.
Gaskell G; Allum N; Wagner W; Kronberger N; Torgersen H; Hampel J; Bardes J
Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):185-94. PubMed ID: 15028010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consumer trust in food safety--a multidisciplinary approach and empirical evidence from Taiwan.
Chen MF
Risk Anal; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1553-69. PubMed ID: 18793284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of similarity cues in the development of trust in sources of information about GM food.
Meijnders A; Midden C; Olofsson A; Ohman S; Matthes J; Bondarenko O; Gutteling J; Rusanen M
Risk Anal; 2009 Aug; 29(8):1116-28. PubMed ID: 19473312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Competence-based and integrity-based trust as predictors of acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS).
Terwel BW; Harinck F; Ellemers N; Daamen DD
Risk Anal; 2009 Aug; 29(8):1129-40. PubMed ID: 19572967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology.
Savadori L; Savio S; Nicotra E; Rumiati R; Finucane M; Slovic P
Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1289-99. PubMed ID: 15563295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attitudes of agricultural scientists in Indonesia towards genetically modified foods.
Februhartanty J; Widyastuti TN; Iswarawanti DN
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2007; 16(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 17468097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trust, confidence, procedural fairness, outcome fairness, moral conviction, and the acceptance of GM field experiments.
Siegrist M; Connor M; Keller C
Risk Anal; 2012 Aug; 32(8):1394-403. PubMed ID: 22150405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chinese public understanding of the use of agricultural biotechnology--a case study from Zhejiang Province of China.
Lü L
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Apr; 7(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 16532526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature.
Finucane ML; Holup JL
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(7):1603-12. PubMed ID: 15652691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attitudes, perceptions, and trust. Insights from a consumer survey regarding genetically modified banana in Uganda.
Kikulwe EM; Wesseler J; Falck-Zepeda J
Appetite; 2011 Oct; 57(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 21704665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Public perceptions of transgenic animals.
Einsiedel EF
Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 16110885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ethics of biotechnology.
Lenoir N
J Biolaw Bus; 2000; Suppl.():111-5. PubMed ID: 12739544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceived naturalness and acceptance of genetically modified food.
Tenbült P; de Vries NK; Dreezens E; Martijn C
Appetite; 2005 Aug; 45(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 15896875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception.
Oeschger MP; Silva CE
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reactions to genetically modified food crops and how perception of risks and benefits influences consumers' information gathering.
Wilson C; Evans G; Leppard P; Syrette J
Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1311-21. PubMed ID: 15563297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
