BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17958502)

  • 21. The gap between science and perception: the case of plant biotechnology in Europe.
    Einsele A
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():1-11. PubMed ID: 17522817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Major psychological factors affecting acceptance of gene-recombination technology.
    Tanaka Y
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1575-83. PubMed ID: 15660613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exploring the structure of attitudes toward genetically modified food.
    Poortinga W; Pidgeon NF
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1707-19. PubMed ID: 17184407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An Asian perspective on GMO and biotechnology issues.
    Teng PP
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():237-40. PubMed ID: 18296345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging.
    Siegrist M; Stampfli N; Kastenholz H; Keller C
    Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 18406006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support.
    Marques MD; Critchley CR; Walshe J
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Jul; 24(5):601-18. PubMed ID: 25063421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Transparent communication strategy on GMOs: will it change public opinion?
    Sinemus K; Egelhofer M
    Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1141-6. PubMed ID: 17703492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior.
    Terpstra T
    Risk Anal; 2011 Oct; 31(10):1658-75. PubMed ID: 21477090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. European public perceptions of food risk: cross-national and methodological comparisons.
    Hohl K; Gaskell G
    Risk Anal; 2008 Apr; 28(2):311-24. PubMed ID: 18419651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lay people's perception of food hazards: comparing aggregated data and individual data.
    Siegrist M; Keller C; Kiers HA
    Appetite; 2006 Nov; 47(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 16828198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What does it mean to trust a health system? A qualitative study of Canadian health care values.
    Abelson J; Miller FA; Giacomini M
    Health Policy; 2009 Jun; 91(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 19117635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An inquiry of the opinions of the French and Belgian populations as regards risk.
    Carlé B; Charron S; Milochevitch A; Hardeman F
    J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jul; 111(1-3):21-7. PubMed ID: 15231344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany.
    Christoph IB; Bruhn M; Roosen J
    Appetite; 2008 Jul; 51(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 18243411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.
    Barnett J; Cooper H; Senior V
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):921-33. PubMed ID: 17958501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the relation between trust and fairness in environmental risk management.
    Earle TC; Siegrist M
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1395-414. PubMed ID: 18631299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Food biotechnology and consumer perceptions in Asia.
    Cairns G
    Food Nutr Bull; 2005 Dec; 26(4):443-4. PubMed ID: 16465994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acceptance of genetically modified foods: the relation between technology and evaluation.
    Tenbült P; De Vries NK; van Breukelen G; Dreezens E; Martijn C
    Appetite; 2008 Jul; 51(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 18336952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards.
    Siegrist M; Keller C; Kastenholz H; Frey S; Wiek A
    Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 17362400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meat in context. On the relation between perceptions and contexts.
    Korzen S; Lassen J
    Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):274-81. PubMed ID: 19944122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attitudes of the public and scientists to biotechnology in Japan at the start of 2000.
    Ng MA; Takeda C; Watanabe T; Macer D
    Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2000 Jul; 10(4):106-13. PubMed ID: 16273712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.