These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17958506)

  • 1. The risk criteria for assessment of temporary changes in a nuclear power plant.
    Cepin M
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):991-8. PubMed ID: 17958506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods and practices used in incident analysis in the Finnish nuclear power industry.
    Suksi S
    J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jul; 111(1-3):73-9. PubMed ID: 15231350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk assessment of external events in nuclear facilities.
    Rogani A; Tabet E
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2004; 40(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 15536280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A methodology for determining interactions in probabilistic safety assessment models by varying one parameter at a time.
    Borgonovo E
    Risk Anal; 2010 Mar; 30(3):385-99. PubMed ID: 20199656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?
    Massol J; Puech A; Boissel JP;
    Therapie; 2007; 62(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 18206104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different sets of reliability data and success criteria in a probabilistic safety assessment for a plant producing nitroglycol.
    Hauptmanns U
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar; 162(2-3):1322-9. PubMed ID: 18650013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision making during nuclear power plant incidents: a new approach to the evaluation of precursor events.
    Smith CL; Borgonovo E
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):1027-42. PubMed ID: 17958509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards acceptability criteria of probabilistic risks of plant protection products.
    Verdonck FA; Van Sprang P; Vanrolleghem PA
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):59-64. PubMed ID: 17390773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Case-control study on childhood cancer in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Germany 1980-2003.
    Spix C; Schmiedel S; Kaatsch P; Schulze-Rath R; Blettner M
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jan; 44(2):275-84. PubMed ID: 18082395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How useful is quantitative risk assessment?
    Apostolakis GE
    Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 15209926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of the Bohunice Nuclear Power Plant on atmospheric radiocarbon.
    Povinec PP; Sivo A; Simon J; Holý K; Chudý M; Richtáriková M; Morávek J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1686-90. PubMed ID: 18534859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The nuclear power industry as an alternative analogy for safety in anaesthesia and a novel approach for the conceptualisation of safety goals.
    Webster CS
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Nov; 60(11):1115-22. PubMed ID: 16229697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk management and risk assessment of novel plant foods: concepts and principles.
    Knudsen I; Søborg I; Eriksen F; Pilegaard K; Pedersen J
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 May; 46(5):1681-705. PubMed ID: 18295954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reevaluation of the emergency planning zone for nuclear power plants in Taiwan using MACCS2 code.
    Wu J; Yang YM; Chen IJ; Chen HT; Chuang KS
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006 Apr; 64(4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16376091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Violations of mrls for pesticide residues in food reported for risk assessment according to RASFF procedures in Poland].
    Ludwicki JK; Kostka G
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2008; 59(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 19227249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. More nuclear safety.
    Hadlington S
    Nature; 1987 Dec 17-23; 330(6149):596. PubMed ID: 3683580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A response to 'The nuclear power industry as an alternative analogy for safety in anaesthesia and a novel approach for the conceptualisation of safety goals'.
    Palmer J
    Anaesthesia; 2006 Jun; 61(6):619; author reply 619-20. PubMed ID: 16704625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The future of nuclear power: value orientations and risk perception.
    Whitfield SC; Rosa EA; Dan A; Dietz T
    Risk Anal; 2009 Mar; 29(3):425-37. PubMed ID: 19000075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cumulative risk assessment of pesticide residues in food.
    Boobis AR; Ossendorp BC; Banasiak U; Hamey PY; Sebestyen I; Moretto A
    Toxicol Lett; 2008 Aug; 180(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 18585444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.