These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1795917)

  • 41. Evaluation of a tactile aid and a cochlear implant in one child.
    Hesketh LJ; Fryauf-Bertschy H; Osberger MJ
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():183-7. PubMed ID: 2069180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):78-89. PubMed ID: 15925193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [No Hearing Sensation after cochlear implantation despite successful objective measurement outcome].
    Gärtner L; Büchner A; Joseph G; Neuburger J; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Apr; 90(4):224-5. PubMed ID: 21181621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Impact of modulating phase duration on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses obtained during cochlear implantation.
    Bonne NX; Douchement D; Hosana G; Desruelles J; Fayoux P; Ruzza I; Vincent C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 25167217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparing the effect of auditory-only and auditory-visual modes in two groups of Persian children using cochlear implants: a randomized clinical trial.
    Oryadi Zanjani MM; Hasanzadeh S; Rahgozar M; Shemshadi H; Purdy SC; Mahmudi Bakhtiari B; Vahab M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 23896386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Cochlear implantation in visually impaired patients--long-term rehabilitation results].
    Szyfter W; Mietkiewska D; Karlik M; Tabaka B; Obrebowska-Kasznia Z; Magierska-Krzysztoń M; Kawczyński M; Nowak K
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2005; 59(3):415-9. PubMed ID: 16117400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Relationship of the implant electrical auditory brainstem response threshold to the postoperative T level in children with cochlear implants.
    Kim LS; Kim SR; Heo SD; Lee MY
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():270-2. PubMed ID: 11892165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cochlear implant performance in a deaf child of deaf parents: a case study.
    Chute PM; Kretschmer RE; Popp AL; Parisier SC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():316-8. PubMed ID: 7668687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Use of acoustic cues by children with cochlear implants.
    Giezen MR; Escudero P; Baker A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1440-57. PubMed ID: 20689031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants.
    Blamey P; Arndt P; Bergeron F; Bredberg G; Brimacombe J; Facer G; Larky J; Lindström B; Nedzelski J; Peterson A; Shipp D; Staller S; Whitford L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(5):293-306. PubMed ID: 9390810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Speech perception in children after cochlear implantation.
    O'Donoghue GM; Nikolopoulos TP; Archbold SM; Tait M
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 9831151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Case report: top hearing performances of a postlingually deaf cochlear implant user.
    Bucher PO; Mathis A; De Min N; Arnold W
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):320-3. PubMed ID: 1475103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
    Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children.
    Schramm B; Bohnert A; Keilmann A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 73(12):1673-81. PubMed ID: 19775758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. What is the optimal timing for bilateral cochlear implantation in children?
    Gordon KA; Jiwani S; Papsin BC
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S8-14. PubMed ID: 21917210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Auditory and speech performance in deaf children with deaf parents after cochlear implant.
    Park GY; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Chung EW; Cho YS; Chung WH; Hong SH
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 23324738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Receptive vocabulary development in deaf children with cochlear implants: achievement in an intensive auditory-oral educational setting.
    Hayes H; Geers AE; Treiman R; Moog JS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 19125035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Communication development in children who receive a cochlear implant by 12 months of age.
    Leigh J; Dettman S; Dowell R; Briggs R
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23442570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.