169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17960396)
1. Comparison of administrative data with the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) colorectal cancer database.
Garout M; Tilney HS; Tekkis PP; Aylin P
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2008 Feb; 23(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 17960396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: ASA and POSSUM-based predictive models.
Al-Homoud S; Purkayastha S; Aziz O; Smith JJ; Thompson MD; Darzi AW; Stamatakis JD; Tekkis PP
Surg Oncol; 2004; 13(2-3):83-92. PubMed ID: 15572090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of CR-POSSUM, original ACPGBI and new ACPGBI scoring systems for colorectal cancer surgery.
Ozkan O; Guner A; Kaya U; Kece C; Reis E; Kesici S;
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2014; 109(6):800-5. PubMed ID: 25560504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time to rethink surgeon-specific outcome data for colorectal surgeons in England: Cross-sectional data of 73,842 resections for colorectal cancer.
Hureibi K; Evans C; Wong L; Ain Q
Int J Surg; 2018 Sep; 57():101-104. PubMed ID: 30142386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland (ACPGBI): Guidelines for the Management of Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus (2017) - Audit and Outcome Reporting.
Faiz O
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 19 Suppl 1():71-73. PubMed ID: 28632313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A model predicting operative mortality in the UK has only limited value in Denmark.
Degett TH; Roikjær O; Iversen LH; Gögenur I
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Feb; 33(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 29279977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The revised ACPGBI model is a simple and accurate predictor of operative mortality after potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer.
Richards CH; Leitch EF; Anderson JH; McKee RF; McMillan DC; Horgan PG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3680-5. PubMed ID: 21674271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A newly devised scoring system for prediction of mortality in patients with colorectal cancer: a prospective study.
Ferjani AM; Griffin D; Stallard N; Wong LS
Lancet Oncol; 2007 Apr; 8(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 17395105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colorectal cancer surgery of octogenarians in Hong Kong: who will survive?
Li WH; Lau TC; Wong KK; Chan AW; Cheung MT
Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Oct; 17(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 21979471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Descriptive study comparing routine hospital administrative data with the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland's National Vascular Database.
Aylin P; Lees T; Baker S; Prytherch D; Ashley S
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):461-5; discussion 466. PubMed ID: 17175183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Developing a national colorectal educational agenda: a survey of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Francis NK; Curtis NJ; Weegenaar C; Boorman PA; Brook A; Thorpe G; Keogh K; Grainger J; Davies J; Wheeler J; Brown SR; Steele RJ; Dawson P;
Colorectal Dis; 2018 Jan; 20(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 28682454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The National Bowel Cancer Audit Project: what do trusts think of the National Bowel Cancer Audit and how can it be improved?
Cornish JA; Tilney HS; Tan E; Thompson MR; Smith JJ; Tekkis PP
Tech Coloproctol; 2011 Mar; 15(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21287225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The United Kingdom National Bowel Cancer Project -- epidemiology and surgical risk in the elderly.
Tan E; Tilney H; Thompson M; Smith J; Tekkis PP;
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Oct; 43(15):2285-94. PubMed ID: 17681782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonelective excisional colorectal surgery in English National Health Service Trusts: a study of outcomes from Hospital Episode Statistics Data between 1996 and 2007.
Faiz O; Warusavitarne J; Bottle A; Tekkis PP; Clark SK; Darzi AW; Aylin P
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Apr; 210(4):390-401. PubMed ID: 20347730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An easy-to-use solution for clinical audit in colorectal cancer surgery.
Ugolini G; Rosati G; Montroni I; Zanotti S; Manaresi A; Giampaolo L; Taffurelli M; Pricolo V
Surgery; 2009 Jan; 145(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 19081479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unreasonable expectations in emergency colorectal cancer surgery.
Metcalfe MS; Norwood MG; Miller AS; Hemingway D
Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 15859967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive value of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, cr-POSSUM, APACHE II and ACPGBI scoring systems in colorectal cancer resection.
Yan J; Wang YX; Li ZP
J Int Med Res; 2011; 39(4):1464-73. PubMed ID: 21986149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland: a questionnaire survey of consultant members of the ACPGBI.
Schwab KE; Dowson HM; Van Dellen J; Marks CG; Rockall TA
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Mar; 11(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 18573117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of postoperative mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.
Heriot AG; Tekkis PP; Smith JJ; Cohen CR; Montgomery A; Audisio RA; Thompson MR; Stamatakis JD
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Jun; 49(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 16741639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.
Archampong D; Borowski D; Wille-Jørgensen P; Iversen LH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD005391. PubMed ID: 22419309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
