434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17960667)
1. Large cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord as a predictor of fetal macrosomia.
Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Siesto G; Bergamini V; Raio L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 30(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 17960667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of umbilical cord thickness and HbA1c levels for the prediction of fetal macrosomia in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Binbir B; Yeniel AO; Ergenoglu AM; Kazandi M; Akercan F; Sagol S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):635-9. PubMed ID: 21837429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of umbilical ring constriction on Wharton's jelly.
Skulstad SM; Ulriksen M; Rasmussen S; Kiserud T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 28(5):692-8. PubMed ID: 16969786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal diagnosis of a lean umbilical cord: a simple marker for the fetus at risk of being small for gestational age at birth.
Raio L; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Franchi M; Maymon E; Mueller MD; Brühwiler H
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Mar; 13(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 10204208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nomogram of Wharton's jelly as depicted in the sonographic cross section of the umbilical cord.
Ghezzi F; Raio L; Di Naro E; Franchi M; Balestreri D; D'Addario V
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 18(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 11529990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antenatal prediction of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies affected by maternal pre-gestational diabetes.
O'Dwyer V; Russell NM; McDonnell B; Sharkey L; Mulcahy C; Higgins MF
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7412-7416. PubMed ID: 34229553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal assessment of Wharton's jelly in umbilical cords with single artery.
Raio L; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Franchi M; Brühwiler H; Lüscher KP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 10461337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Altered sonographic umbilical cord morphometry in early-onset preeclampsia.
Raio L; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Franchi M; Bolla D; Schneider H
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 100(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 12151155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: improving ultrasonography-based prediction.
Sokol RJ; Chik L; Dombrowski MP; Zador IE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1489-95. PubMed ID: 10871470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Umbilical Cord Biometry and Fetal Abdominal Skinfold Assessment as Potential Biomarkers for Fetal Macrosomia in a Gestational Diabetes Romanian Cohort.
Florian AR; Cruciat G; Nemeti G; Staicu A; Suciu C; Sulaiman MC; Goidescu I; Muresan D; Stamatian F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Aug; 58(9):. PubMed ID: 36143839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement and evaluation of fetal fat layer in the prediction of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes.
Elessawy M; Harders C; Kleinwechter H; Demandt N; Sheasha GA; Maass N; Pecks U; Eckmann-Scholz C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Sep; 296(3):445-453. PubMed ID: 28631075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are there any relationships between umbilical artery Pulsatility Index and macrosomia in fetuses of type I diabetic mothers?
Maruotti GM; Rizzo G; Sirico A; Sarno L; Cirigliano L; Arduini D; Martinelli P
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(17):1776-81. PubMed ID: 24397275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes: finding the best formula.
Shmueli A; Salman L; Hadar E; Aviram A; Bardin R; Ashwal E; Gabbay-Benziv R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30327863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reference intervals for the cross sectional area of the umbilical cord during gestation.
Togni FA; Araujo Júnior E; Moron AF; Vasques FA; Torloni MR; Nardozza LM; Guimarães Filho HA
J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 17302517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Umbilical cord thickness in the first and early second trimesters and perinatal outcome.
Goynumer G; Ozdemir A; Wetherilt L; Durukan B; Yayla M
J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(6):523-6. PubMed ID: 18651833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The change of umbilical cord components in intrauterine growth restriction comparative with normal growth fetuses by using sonographic measurement.
Somprasit C; Chanthasenanont A; Nuntakomon T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S15-20. PubMed ID: 21294395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intrapartum fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio: an ultrasonographic clue to fetal macrosomia.
Santolaya-Forgas J; Meyer WJ; Gauthier DW; Kahn D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1072-5. PubMed ID: 7943073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
