These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17961818)

  • 1. The law of unintended consequences: The Joint Commission regulations and the digital rectal examination.
    Adams BD; McHugh KJ; Bryson SA; Dabulewicz J
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Feb; 51(2):197-201, 201.e1. PubMed ID: 17961818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of removal of point-of-care fecal occult blood testing on performance of digital rectal examinations in the emergency department.
    Cleveland NJ; Yaron M; Ginde AA
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Aug; 56(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 20060198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective evaluation of the use and outcome of admission stool guaiac testing: the Digital Rectal Examination on Admission to the Medical Service (DREAMS) Study.
    Bini EJ; Reinhold JP; Weinshel EH; Generoso R; Salman L; Dahr G; Pena-Sing I
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2006 Oct; 40(9):821-7. PubMed ID: 17016139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital rectal fecal occult blood screening during gynecologic examination.
    Willis FL; Fanning J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 190(5):1422-3. PubMed ID: 15167856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital fecal occult blood testing in the ambulatory urology clinic.
    Goetzl MA; Outman JE; Griebling TL; Holzbeierlein JM; Weigel JW; Thrasher JB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jan; 206(1):144-7. PubMed ID: 18155580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical utilization of digital rectal examination and fecal occult blood testing upon hospital admission.
    Scales CD; Fein S; Muir AJ; Rockey DC
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2006; 40(10):913-8. PubMed ID: 17063111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An audit of the utility of in-patient fecal occult blood testing.
    Sharma VK; Komanduri S; Nayyar S; Headly A; Modlinger P; Metz DC; Verghese VJ; Wanahita A; Go MF; Howden CW
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Apr; 96(4):1256-60. PubMed ID: 11316179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Poor test characteristics for the digital rectal examination in trauma patients.
    Shlamovitz GZ; Mower WR; Bergman J; Crisp J; DeVore HK; Hardy D; Sargent M; Shroff SD; Snyder E; Morgan MT
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Jul; 50(1):25-33, 33.e1. PubMed ID: 17391807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lower specificity of occult-blood test on stool collected by digital rectal examination.
    Zhang B; Nakama H; Fattah AS; Kamijo N
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(43):165-7. PubMed ID: 11949640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of observed versus documented physician assessment and treatment of pain: the physician record does not reflect the reality.
    Chisholm CD; Weaver CS; Whenmouth LF; Giles B; Brizendine EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Oct; 52(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 18339446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are doctors examining prostates in university hospital?
    Lim CH; Quinlan DM
    Urology; 2007 Nov; 70(5):843-5. PubMed ID: 18068436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital rectal examination and the primary care physicians: a lost art?
    Safder S; Rewalt M; Elitsur Y
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2006 Jun; 45(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 16891273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of the digital rectal examination in the evaluation of undifferentiated abdominal pain.
    Quaas J; Lanigan M; Newman D; McOsker J; Babayev R; Mason C
    Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Nov; 27(9):1125-9. PubMed ID: 19931762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of claims, medical records, and self-report for measuring fecal occult blood testing among medicare enrollees in fee for service.
    Schenck AP; Klabunde CN; Warren JL; Peacock S; Davis WW; Hawley ST; Pignone M; Ransohoff DF
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Apr; 17(4):799-804. PubMed ID: 18381471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selected topics in point-of-care testing. Urinalysis, pregnancy testing, microbiology, fecal occult blood, and other tests.
    Lee-Lewandrowski E; Lewandrowski K
    Clin Lab Med; 2001 Jun; 21(2):389-404. PubMed ID: 11396091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inappropriate use of the faecal occult blood test in a university hospital in the Netherlands.
    van Rijn AF; Stroobants AK; Deutekom M; Lauppe C; Sturk A; Bossuyt PM; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Nov; 24(11):1266-9. PubMed ID: 23022920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for skin cancer in primary care settings.
    Federman DG; Concato J; Caralis PV; Hunkele GE; Kirsner RS
    Arch Dermatol; 1997 Nov; 133(11):1423-5. PubMed ID: 9371027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preoperative testing for fecal occult blood: a questionable practice.
    Sonnenberg A; Townsend WF
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1992 Oct; 87(10):1410-7. PubMed ID: 1415097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utility of the digital rectal examination in the emergency department: a review.
    Kessler C; Bauer SJ
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 43(6):1196-204. PubMed ID: 22883714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost analysis for decision support: the case of comparing centralized versus distributed methods for blood gas testing.
    Kilgore ML; Steindel SJ; Smith JA
    J Healthc Manag; 1999; 44(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 10537498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.