These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

705 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17961895)

  • 1. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield.
    Malinowski P; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 414(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17207932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.
    Burnham BR; Rozell CA; Kasper A; Bianco NE; Delliturri A
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 21295901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of allocation of visuo-spatial attention to visual stimuli triggering unilateral arm abduction on anticipatory postural control.
    Tomita H; Fujiwara K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 119(9):2086-97. PubMed ID: 18620907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of the cholinergic agonist nicotine on reorienting of visual spatial attention and top-down attentional control.
    Thiel CM; Fink GR
    Neuroscience; 2008 Mar; 152(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 18272290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of distracters, stimulus duration and hemianopia on first saccade in patients with unilateral neglect.
    Gainotti G; De Luca L; Figliozzi F; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 19231479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of saliency, not global dominance, in patients with left parietal damage.
    Mevorach C; Humphreys GW; Shalev L
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(2):307-19. PubMed ID: 15936046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention.
    Grosbras MH; Paus T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1109-20. PubMed ID: 12419133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emotionally arousing stimuli compete for attention with left hemispace.
    Hartikainen KM; Ogawa KH; Soltani M; Knight RT
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1929-33. PubMed ID: 18007189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Homotopy and heterotopy and the bilateral field advantage in the Dimond paradigm.
    Desjardins S; Braun CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 16137627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional and sensory effects of lowered levels of intrinsic alertness.
    Matthias E; Bublak P; Costa A; Müller HJ; Schneider WX; Finke K
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Dec; 47(14):3255-64. PubMed ID: 19682470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional origins of the Simon effect: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Melara RD; Wang H; Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():147-59. PubMed ID: 18474363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simon effect with and without awareness of the accessory stimulus.
    Treccani B; Umiltà C; Tagliabue M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):268-86. PubMed ID: 16634670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for divided automatic attention.
    Silva PS; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2008 Feb; 41(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 18297196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.