These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17961946)

  • 1. Comparison of the aortic valve calcium content in the bicuspid and tricuspid stenotic aortic valve using non-enhanced 64-detector-row-computed tomography with prospective ECG-triggering.
    Ferda J; Linhartová K; Kreuzberg B
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):471-5. PubMed ID: 17961946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of the ascending aorta diameter in patients with severe bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis using dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.
    Son JY; Ko SM; Choi JW; Song MG; Hwang HK; Lee SJ; Kang JW
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Dec; 27 Suppl 1():61-71. PubMed ID: 22009020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of age and aortic valve anatomy on calcification and haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis.
    Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Larose É; Bédard É; Arsenault M; Chetaille P; Dumesnil JG; Mathieu P; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    Heart; 2017 Jan; 103(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 27504001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stenotic Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves　- Micro-Computed Tomography and Biological Indices of Calcification.
    Mazur P; Wypasek E; Gawęda B; Sobczyk D; Kapusta P; Natorska J; Malinowski KP; Tarasiuk J; Bochenek M; Wroński S; Chmielewska K; Kapelak B; Undas A
    Circ J; 2017 Jun; 81(7):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 28344201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology.
    Ye Z; Clavel MA; Foley TA; Pibarot P; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
    Heart; 2024 Mar; 110(8):594-602. PubMed ID: 37903555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ascending aorta dilatation rates in patients with tricuspid and bicuspid aortic stenosis: the COFRASA/GENERAC study.
    Kerneis C; Pasi N; Arangalage D; Nguyen V; Mathieu T; Verdonk C; Codogno I; Ou P; Duval X; Tubiana S; Cimadevilla C; Vahanian A; Messika-Zeitoun D
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jul; 19(7):792-799. PubMed ID: 28950334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aortic root, not valve, calcification correlates with coronary artery calcification in patients with severe aortic stenosis: A two-center study.
    Henein M; Hällgren P; Holmgren A; Sörensen K; Ibrahimi P; Kofoed KF; Larsen LH; Hassager C
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Dec; 243(2):631-7. PubMed ID: 26551591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fused aortic valve without an elliptical-shaped systolic orifice in patients with severe aortic stenosis: cardiac computed tomography is useful for differentiation between bicuspid aortic valve with raphe and tricuspid aortic valve with commissural fusion.
    Bak SH; Ko SM; Song MG; Shin JK; Chee HK; Kim JS
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):1208-17. PubMed ID: 25424562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indexed aortic valve area using multimodality imaging for assessing the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis.
    Yagi N; Hasegawa H; Kuwajima K; Ogawa M; Yamane T; Shiota T
    Int J Cardiol; 2024 Nov; 414():132416. PubMed ID: 39098616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of anatomical aortic valve area using real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis: a comparison between tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves.
    Machida T; Izumo M; Suzuki K; Yoneyama K; Kamijima R; Mizukoshi K; Takai M; Kobayashi Y; Harada T; Miyake F; Ohtaki E; Nobuoka S; Matsumoto N; Akashi YJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 16(10):1120-8. PubMed ID: 25762561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ex vivo assessment of valve thickness/calcification of patients with calcific aortic stenosis in relation to in vivo clinical outcomes.
    Cheng CL; Chang HH; Huang PJ; Wang WC; Lin SY
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():324-332. PubMed ID: 28651163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidental aortic valve calcification on CT scans: significance for bicuspid and tricuspid valve disease.
    Hope MD; Urbania TH; Yu JP; Chitsaz S; Tseng E
    Acad Radiol; 2012 May; 19(5):542-7. PubMed ID: 22104287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence of subannular and left ventricular morphological differences in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis.
    Disha K; Dubslaff G; Rouman M; Fey B; Borger MA; Barker AJ; Kuntze T; Girdauskas E
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Mar; 24(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 28040769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis.
    Willmann JK; Weishaupt D; Lachat M; Kobza R; Roos JE; Seifert B; Lüscher TF; Marincek B; Hilfiker PR
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 12354994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenges of recognizing bicuspid aortic valve in elderly patients undergoing TAVR.
    Kim WK; Liebetrau C; Fischer-Rasokat U; Renker M; Rolf A; Doss M; Möllmann H; Nef H; Walther T; Hamm CW
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 36(2):251-256. PubMed ID: 31587128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic root geometry in patients with aortic stenosis assessed by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.
    Wu VC; Kaku K; Takeuchi M; Otani K; Yoshitani H; Tamura M; Abe H; Lin FC; Otsuji Y
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jan; 27(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 24238752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bicuspid aortic valve leaflet morphology in relation to aortic root morphology: a study of 300 patients undergoing open-heart surgery.
    Jackson V; Petrini J; Caidahl K; Eriksson MJ; Liska J; Eriksson P; Franco-Cereceda A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):e118-24. PubMed ID: 21620721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of a single-beat prospective ECG-gated cardiac CT for comprehensive evaluation of aortic valve disease using a 256-detector row wide-volume CT scanner: an initial experience.
    Kim JY; Suh YJ; Chang S; Im DJ; Hong YJ; Lee HJ; Hur J; Kim YJ; Choi BW
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Feb; 34(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 28770455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary experience in the assessment of aortic valve calcification by ECG-gated multislice spiral computed tomography.
    Koos R; Mahnken AH; Sinha AM; Wildberger JE; Hoffmann R; Kühl HP
    Int J Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 102(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 15982484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aortic valve calcification as a marker for aortic stenosis severity: assessment on 16-MDCT.
    Koos R; Mahnken AH; Sinha AM; Wildberger JE; Hoffmann R; Kühl HP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1813-8. PubMed ID: 15547235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.