These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17962087)

  • 21. Structural damage to meiotic chromosomes impairs DNA recombination and checkpoint control in mammalian oocytes.
    Wang H; Höög C
    J Cell Biol; 2006 May; 173(4):485-95. PubMed ID: 16717125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Elevated mutation rate during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Rattray A; Santoyo G; Shafer B; Strathern JN
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Jan; 11(1):e1004910. PubMed ID: 25569256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characterization of meiotic recombination initiation sites using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
    Farmer S; Leung WK; Tsubouchi H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 745():33-45. PubMed ID: 21660687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Drosophila PCH2 is required for a pachytene checkpoint that monitors double-strand-break-independent events leading to meiotic crossover formation.
    Joyce EF; McKim KS
    Genetics; 2009 Jan; 181(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 18957704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The DNA damage response during mitosis.
    Heijink AM; Krajewska M; van Vugt MA
    Mutat Res; 2013 Oct; 750(1-2):45-55. PubMed ID: 23880065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Colocalization of somatic and meiotic double strand breaks near the Myc oncogene on mouse chromosome 15.
    Ng SH; Maas SA; Petkov PM; Mills KD; Paigen K
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2009 Oct; 48(10):925-30. PubMed ID: 19603522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The spatial regulation of meiotic recombination hotspots: are all DSB hotspots crossover hotspots?
    Serrentino ME; Borde V
    Exp Cell Res; 2012 Jul; 318(12):1347-52. PubMed ID: 22487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. HTP-3 links DSB formation with homolog pairing and crossing over during C. elegans meiosis.
    Goodyer W; Kaitna S; Couteau F; Ward JD; Boulton SJ; Zetka M
    Dev Cell; 2008 Feb; 14(2):263-74. PubMed ID: 18267094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ATR signaling in mammalian meiosis: From upstream scaffolds to downstream signaling.
    Pereira C; Smolka MB; Weiss RS; Brieño-Enríquez MA
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2020 Aug; 61(7):752-766. PubMed ID: 32725817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating the number of double-strand breaks formed during meiosis from partial observation.
    Toyoizumi H; Tsubouchi H
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1277-83. PubMed ID: 23210475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rad9, a 53BP1 Ortholog of Budding Yeast, Is Insensitive to Spo11-Induced Double-Strand Breaks During Meiosis.
    Usui T; Shinohara A
    Front Cell Dev Biol; 2021; 9():635383. PubMed ID: 33842461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mechanisms and regulation of DNA end resection.
    Longhese MP; Bonetti D; Manfrini N; Clerici M
    EMBO J; 2010 Sep; 29(17):2864-74. PubMed ID: 20647996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exploring the pathways of homologous recombination.
    Haber JE
    Curr Opin Cell Biol; 1992 Jun; 4(3):401-12. PubMed ID: 1323316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Partners and pathwaysrepairing a double-strand break.
    Haber JE
    Trends Genet; 2000 Jun; 16(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 10827453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gametocidal genes induce chromosome breakage in the interphase prior to the first mitotic cell division of the male gametophyte in wheat.
    Nasuda S; Friebe B; Gill BS
    Genetics; 1998 Jun; 149(2):1115-24. PubMed ID: 9611219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Meiotic and mitotic recombination in meiosis.
    Kohl KP; Sekelsky J
    Genetics; 2013 Jun; 194(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 23733849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. mus304 encodes a novel DNA damage checkpoint protein required during Drosophila development.
    Brodsky MH; Sekelsky JJ; Tsang G; Hawley RS; Rubin GM
    Genes Dev; 2000 Mar; 14(6):666-78. PubMed ID: 10733527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mitotic DNA Damage Response: At the Crossroads of Structural and Numerical Cancer Chromosome Instabilities.
    Bakhoum SF; Kabeche L; Compton DA; Powell SN; Bastians H
    Trends Cancer; 2017 Mar; 3(3):225-234. PubMed ID: 28718433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation.
    Clay DE; Bretscher HS; Jezuit EA; Bush KB; Fox DT
    J Cell Biol; 2021 Dec; 220(12):. PubMed ID: 34613334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Processing DNA lesions during mitosis to prevent genomic instability.
    Audrey A; de Haan L; van Vugt MATM; de Boer HR
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2022 Aug; 50(4):1105-1118. PubMed ID: 36040211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.