These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17962317)

  • 1. Evaluation of the debonding strength of orthodontic brackets using three different bonding systems.
    Valletta R; Prisco D; De Santis R; Ambrosio L; Martina R
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 17962317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does ozone water affect the bond strengths of orthodontic brackets?
    Pithon MM; dos Santos RL
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 20575204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
    Pannes DD; Bailey DK; Thompson JY; Pietz DM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metallic brackets bonded with resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements under different enamel conditions.
    Pithon MM; Dos Santos RL; de Oliveira MV; Ruellas AC; Romano FL
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):700-4. PubMed ID: 16808580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear and tensile bond strength comparison of various contemporary orthodontic adhesive systems: an in-vitro study.
    Reicheneder CA; Gedrange T; Lange A; Baumert U; Proff P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):422.e1-6; discussion 422-3. PubMed ID: 19361721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Movahhed HZ; Ogaard B; Syverud M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16043469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One-component self-etching primer: a seventh generation of orthodontic bonding system?
    Pithon MM; dos Santos RL; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 20164128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of different bracket base surfaces on tensile and shear bond strength.
    Algera TJ; Kleverlaan CJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Feilzer AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 18684707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
    Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond strengths and adhesive remnant index of self-etching adhesives used to bond brackets to instrumented and uninstrumented enamel.
    Ritter DE; Ritter AV; Bruggeman G; Locks A; Tulloch JF
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16555658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 19793779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Ostby AW; Bishara SE; Denehy GE; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18675201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of shear bond strengths of three visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives.
    Owens SE; Miller BH
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 11036994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bond strength of brackets cemented with light-cured glass-ionomer cements to contaminated enamel.
    Itoh T; Fukushima T; Inoue Y; Matsuo N; Matsumoto M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 11763927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tensile and shear bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement to glazed porcelain.
    Kitayama Y; Komori A; Nakahara R
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 12940567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of dynamic fatigue loading on the separate components of the bracket-cement-enamel system.
    Algera TJ; Kleverlaan CJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Feilzer AJ
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 18795520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.