BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17963996)

  • 21. The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature--a 35-year perspective.
    Jagsi R; Guancial EA; Worobey CC; Henault LE; Chang Y; Starr R; Tarbell NJ; Hylek EM
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Jul; 355(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 16855268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Authors' Submission Toolkit: a practical guide to getting your research published.
    Chipperfield L; Citrome L; Clark J; David FS; Enck R; Evangelista M; Gonzalez J; Groves T; Magrann J; Mansi B; Miller C; Mooney LA; Murphy A; Shelton J; Walson PD; Weigel A
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Aug; 26(8):1967-82. PubMed ID: 20569069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
    Kowalczuk MK; Dudbridge F; Nanda S; Harriman SL; Patel J; Moylan EC
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008707. PubMed ID: 26423855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway.
    Naqvi KR
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Double-blind review: easy to guess in specialist fields.
    Lane D
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prepublication review of medical ethics research: cause for concern.
    Landy DC; Coverdale JH; McCullough LB; Sharp RR
    Acad Med; 2009 Apr; 84(4):495-7. PubMed ID: 19318788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality of medical journals with special reference to the Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal.
    Aly AM
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S18-20. PubMed ID: 14968186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Publishing in English-language journals.
    Davis AJ; Tschudin V
    Nurs Ethics; 2007 May; 14(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 17459824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal.
    O'Connor EE; Cousar M; Lentini JA; Castillo M; Halm K; Zeffiro TA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 27856433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spine journals: is reviewer agreement on publication recommendations greater than would be expected by chance?
    Weiner BK; Weiner JP; Smith HE
    Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 20207330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
    Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
    J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. ["Invisible hand of a reviewer"--peer review of papers in "Morfologia" journal. Current practice and perspectives].
    Bykov VL
    Morfologiia; 2002; 122(6):7-9. PubMed ID: 12630084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing].
    Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A significant decline in the American domination of research in gastroenterology with increasing globalization from 1980 to 2005: an analysis of American authorship among 8,251 articles.
    Cappell MS; Davis M
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1065-74. PubMed ID: 18477339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The cases for and against double-blind reviews.
    Cox AR; Montgomerie R
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e6702. PubMed ID: 30972261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
    Algase DL
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Peer review. Suggesting or excluding reviewers can help get your paper published.
    Grimm D
    Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5743):1974. PubMed ID: 16179438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Journal policy on ethics in scientific publication.
    Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 12514687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Peer reviewers can meet journals' criteria for authorship.
    Erren TC; Erren M; Shaw DM
    BMJ; 2013 Jan; 346():f166. PubMed ID: 23325884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.