These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
783 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17964212)
1. The effect of lens wear on refractive index of conventional hydrogel and silicone-hydrogel contact lenses: a comparative study. Lira M; Santos L; Azeredo J; Yebra-Pimentel E; Real Oliveira ME Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2008 Apr; 31(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 17964212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Refractive index and equilibrium water content of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. González-Méijome JM; Lira M; López-Alemany A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA; Refojo MF Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 16390483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial adhesion to worn silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Santos L; Rodrigues D; Lira M; Real Oliveira ME; Oliveira R; Vilar EY; Azeredo J Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):520-5. PubMed ID: 18594343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Initial comfort of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses versus etafilcon A contact lenses for extended wear. Martin R; de Juan V; Rodriguez G; Martin S; Fonseca S Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17178252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attachment of Acanthamoeba to first- and second-generation silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Beattie TK; Tomlinson A; McFadyen AK Ophthalmology; 2006 Jan; 113(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 16360208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Dumbleton K; Keir N; Moezzi A; Feng Y; Jones L; Fonn D Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):758-68. PubMed ID: 17041322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proteins identified from care solution extractions of silicone hydrogels. Emch AJ; Nichols JJ Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 86(2):E123-31. PubMed ID: 19156010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers. Best N; Drury L; Wolffsohn JS Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):232-7. PubMed ID: 23522993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in UV-visible transmittance of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses induced by wear. Lira M; Dos Santos Castanheira EM; Santos L; Azeredo J; Yebra-Pimentel E; Real Oliveira ME Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 86(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19289976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Therapeutic use of a lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel soft contact lens as a bandage after LASEK surgery. Szaflik JP; Ambroziak AM; Szaflik J Eye Contact Lens; 2004 Jan; 30(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 14722473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adverse events and discontinuations during 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Santodomingo-Rubido J; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):288-92. PubMed ID: 17993823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging protein deposits on contact lens materials. Teichroeb JH; Forrest JA; Ngai V; Martin JW; Jones L; Medley J Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1151-64. PubMed ID: 19050470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hydrogel lens comfort in challenging environments and the effect of refitting with silicone hydrogel lenses. Young G; Riley CM; Chalmers RL; Hunt C Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 84(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 17435513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Santos L; Rodrigues D; Lira M; Oliveira ME; Oliveira R; Vilar EY; Azeredo J Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Jul; 30(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 17291818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in ocular physiology, tear film characteristics, and symptomatology with 18 months silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Santodomingo-Rubido J; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16501408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time. Carney FP; Nash WL; Sentell KB Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 49(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18172083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses for bullous keratoplasty. Lim N; Vogt U Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Sep; 32(5):250-3. PubMed ID: 16974160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical performance of a silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear in an Asian population. Long B; McNally J Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Mar; 32(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 16538125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of surface treatment of silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the attachment of Acanthamoeba castellanii trophozoites. Beattie TK; Tomlinson A Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Nov; 35(6):316-9. PubMed ID: 19826253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]