BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17964325)

  • 1. Comparison between motility of biointegratable and silicone orbital implants.
    Yazici B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 144(5):786-7; author reply 787. PubMed ID: 17964325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between motility of biointegratable and silicone orbital implants.
    González-Candial M; Umaña MA; Galvez C; Medel R; Ayala E
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):711-2. PubMed ID: 17386291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative motility of hydroxyapatite and alloplastic enucleation implants.
    Custer PL; Trinkaus KM; Fornoff J
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Mar; 106(3):513-6. PubMed ID: 10080207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary peg placement in evisceration with the spherical porous polyethylene orbital implant.
    Tawfik HA; Dutton JJ
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jul; 111(7):1401-6. PubMed ID: 15234145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complications of orbital implants: a review of 542 patients who have undergone orbital implantation and 275 subsequent PEG placements.
    Shoamanesh A; Pang NK; Oestreicher JH
    Orbit; 2007 Sep; 26(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 17891645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of orbital prosthesis motility following enucleation or evisceration with sclerotomy with or without a motility coupling post in dogs.
    Yi NY; Park SA; Jeong MB; Kim WT; Kim SE; Kim JY; Chae JM; Jang KJ; Seong JK; Seo KM
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2009; 12(3):139-51. PubMed ID: 19392873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosthetic motility in pegged versus unpegged integrated porous orbital implants.
    Guillinta P; Vasani SN; Granet DB; Kikkawa DO
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 19(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 12644757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motility assessment and clinical outcomes of a magnetically integrated microporous implant.
    Miller DM; Murray T; Suarez F; Cicciarelli NL; Swords GG
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2007; 38(4):339-41. PubMed ID: 17674929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re: "long-term follow-up of porous polyethylene spherical implants after enucleation and evisceration".
    Jordan DR
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(6):500-1; author reply 501. PubMed ID: 18030136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explanted polyethylene implants.
    Sandramouli S; Tambe K; Pushpoth S; Mudhar H
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):194-5; author reply 195. PubMed ID: 20114114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re: "long-term follow-up of porous polyethylene spherical implants after enucleation and evisceration".
    Fountain TR
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(6):500; author reply 501. PubMed ID: 18030137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new technique with the hydroxyapatite implant.
    Suvağ N; Katircioğlu Y; Duman S
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2004; 48(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 15060803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retroscleral implantation technique for porous polyethylene orbital implant after evisceration.
    Choung HK; Han SK; Khwarg SI
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16238047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial eye amplitudes and characteristics in enucleated socket with porous polyethylene spherical and quad-motility implant.
    Lucci LM; Höfling-Lima AL; Erwenne CM; Toledo Cassano EM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 18157310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primary implant placement with evisceration in patients with endophthalmitis.
    Ozgur OR; Akcay L; Dogan OK
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):902-4. PubMed ID: 17452189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re: "enucleation with hydroxyapatite implantation versus evisceration plus scleral quadrisection and alloplastic implantation".
    Yazici B
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010; 26(3):223-4; author reply 224. PubMed ID: 20489562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Late exposure of the bioceramic orbital implant.
    Wang JK; Lai PC; Liao SL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):162-170.e1. PubMed ID: 18571617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of experimental porous silicone implants and porous silicone implants.
    Son J; Kim CS; Yang J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 250(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 22202952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re: "The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases".
    Mittal R; Thomas R; Naik M; Honavar SG
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Sep; 20(5):403; author reply 403-4. PubMed ID: 15377917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hydroxyapatite orbital implants.
    Oestreicher JH
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Nov; 115(11):2096; author reply 2096-7. PubMed ID: 19068380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.