These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17965982)

  • 1. "None of the above" as a correct and incorrect alternative on a multiple-choice test: implications for the testing effect.
    Odegard TN; Koen JD
    Memory; 2007 Nov; 15(8):873-85. PubMed ID: 17965982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2007 Dec; 13(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 18194050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.
    Roediger HL; Marsh EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):1155-9. PubMed ID: 16248758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Memorial consequences of answering SAT II questions.
    Marsh EJ; Agarwal PK; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19309212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating the potential influence of established multiple-choice test-taking cues on item response in a pharmacotherapy board certification examination preparatory manual: a pilot study.
    Gettig JP
    Pharmacotherapy; 2006 Apr; 26(4):558-62. PubMed ID: 16553516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. All of the above: When multiple correct response options enhance the testing effect.
    Bishara AJ; Lanzo LA
    Memory; 2015; 23(7):1013-28. PubMed ID: 25122187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How "none of the above" (NOTA) affects the accessibility of tested and related information in multiple-choice questions.
    Blendermann MF; Little JL; Gray KM
    Memory; 2020 Apr; 28(4):473-480. PubMed ID: 32106781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple-choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges: fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting.
    Little JL; Bjork EL; Bjork RA; Angello G
    Psychol Sci; 2012; 23(11):1337-44. PubMed ID: 23034566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):918-28. PubMed ID: 18605878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying.
    Butler AC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1118-33. PubMed ID: 20804289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning.
    Little JL; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 25123774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing.
    Butler AC; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Apr; 36(3):604-16. PubMed ID: 18491500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correcting for guessing increases validity in multiple-choice examinations in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course.
    Prihoda TJ; Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Apr; 70(4):378-86. PubMed ID: 16595530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests.
    Fazio LK; Agarwal PK; Marsh EJ; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jun; 38(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 20516221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized controlled trial comparing instructions regarding unsafe response options in a MCQ examination.
    Tweed M; Wilkinson T
    Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 18825569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Knierim A; Hayes SK; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Dec; 26(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 17014932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memorial consequences of testing school-aged children.
    Marsh EJ; Fazio LK; Goswick AE
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):899-906. PubMed ID: 22891857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall.
    Unsworth N
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):386-96. PubMed ID: 19358013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model.
    Huber DE; Clark TF; Curran T; Winkielman P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1305-24. PubMed ID: 18980396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective implementation of correction for guessing in oral and maxillofacial pathology multiple-choice examinations: did student performance improve?
    Prihoda TJ; Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Littlefield JH; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1149-59. PubMed ID: 18923095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.