These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17965982)

  • 21. Comparison between computer-aided testing and traditional multiple choice: an equivalence study.
    Karl M; Graef F; Eitner S; Beck N; Wichmann M; Holst S
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2007 Feb; 11(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 17227394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How did you guess? Or, what do multiple-choice questions measure?
    Cox KR
    Med J Aust; 1976 Jun; 1(23):884-6. PubMed ID: 967086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of study strategies for passages: rereading, answering questions, and generating questions.
    Weinstein Y; McDermott KB; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Sep; 16(3):308-16. PubMed ID: 20853989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nonrestricted multiple-choice examination items.
    Kolstad R; Goaz P; Kolstad R
    J Dent Educ; 1982 Aug; 46(8):485-8. PubMed ID: 6954178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Proactive and retroactive effects of negative suggestion.
    Brown AS; Brown CM; Mosbacher JL; Dryden WE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1234-43. PubMed ID: 17087580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multiple choice questions revisited.
    Anderson J
    Med Teach; 2004 Mar; 26(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 15203517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clarification of the memory artefact in the assessment of suggestibility.
    Willner P
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Apr; 52(Pt 4):318-26. PubMed ID: 18339094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Effect of Type of Feedback in Multiple-Choice Testing on Long-Term Retention.
    Jang Y; Marshall E
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(2):107-119. PubMed ID: 29547068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall.
    Steffens MC; Erdfelder E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Nov; 51(4):705-33. PubMed ID: 9854440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual memory for place on the page.
    Zechmeister EB; McKillip J; Pasko S; Bespalec D
    J Gen Psychol; 1975 Jan; 92(1st Half):43-52. PubMed ID: 1113087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three- and four-option multiple-choice questions in nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2010 Aug; 30(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 20053488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Method for calculating the distribution of randomly expected scores in a false-true-do not know-type of test].
    Pérez-Padilla JR; Viniegra Velázquez L
    Rev Invest Clin; 1989; 41(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 2631171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.
    Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 16507066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cuing effect of "all of the above" on the reliability and validity of multiple-choice test items.
    Harasym PH; Leong EJ; Violato C; Brant R; Lorscheider FL
    Eval Health Prof; 1998 Mar; 21(1):120-33. PubMed ID: 10183336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.
    Smith TA; Kimball DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cueing in multiple choice questions: a reliable, valid and economical solution.
    Veloski JJ; Rabinowitz HK; Robeson MR
    Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():195-200. PubMed ID: 3218856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options.
    Vyas R; Supe A
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 19004145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Regulation of memory accuracy with multiple answers: the plurality option.
    Luna K; Higham PA; Martín-Luengo B
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Jun; 17(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 21500935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Successful part-whole perception in young children using multiple-choice tests.
    Boisvert M; Standing L; Moller L
    J Genet Psychol; 1999 Jun; 160(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 10349726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. School-achievement test with two possible correct responses.
    Komenda S; Majer P; Podstata J
    Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med; 1983; 105():191-201. PubMed ID: 6229144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.