BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17966180)

  • 1. Intense pulsed light versus advanced fluorescent technology pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a split-face pilot comparison.
    Braun M
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 6(10):1024-8. PubMed ID: 17966180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of light-emitting diode photomodulation to reduce erythema and discomfort after intense pulsed light treatment of photodamage.
    Khoury JG; Goldman MP
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2008 Mar; 7(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 18254808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a randomized split-face trial with blinded response evaluation.
    Jørgensen GF; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
    Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Jul; 40(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 18563775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid combined with intense pulsed light in the treatment of photoaging.
    Dover JS; Bhatia AC; Stewart B; Arndt KA
    Arch Dermatol; 2005 Oct; 141(10):1247-52. PubMed ID: 16230562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of photoaging with a very superficial Er:YAG laser in combination with a broadband light source.
    Berlin AL; Hussain M; Phelps R; Goldberg DJ
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2007 Nov; 6(11):1114-8. PubMed ID: 18038499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Split treatment of photodamaged skin with KTP 532 nm laser with 10 mm handpiece versus IPL: a cheek-to-cheek comparison.
    Butler EG; McClellan SD; Ross EV
    Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Feb; 38(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 16142765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Split-face randomized treatment of facial telangiectasia comparing pulsed dye laser and an intense pulsed light handpiece.
    Tanghetti EA
    Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Feb; 44(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22180317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced full-face skin rejuvenation using synchronous intense pulsed optical and conducted bipolar radiofrequency energy (ELOS): introducing selective radiophotothermolysis.
    Sadick NS; Alexiades-Armenakas M; Bitter P; Hruza G; Mulholland RS
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2005; 4(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15776775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-session combination treatment with intense pulsed light and nonablative fractional photothermolysis: a split-face study.
    Kearney C; Brew D
    Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jul; 38(7 Pt 1):1002-9. PubMed ID: 22574965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison study of intense pulsed light versus a long-pulse pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial skin rejuvenation.
    Kono T; Groff WF; Sakurai H; Takeuchi M; Yamaki T; Soejima K; Nozaki M
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Nov; 59(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 17992138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of botulinum toxin type A on full-face intense pulsed light treatment: a randomized, double-blind, split-face study.
    Khoury JG; Saluja R; Goldman MP
    Dermatol Surg; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1062-9. PubMed ID: 18462423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skin rejuvenation using intense pulsed light: a randomized controlled split-face trial with blinded response evaluation.
    Hedelund L; Due E; Bjerring P; Wulf HC; Haedersdal M
    Arch Dermatol; 2006 Aug; 142(8):985-90. PubMed ID: 16924047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Split-face treatment of facial dyschromia: pulsed dye laser with a compression handpiece versus intense pulsed light.
    Galeckas KJ; Collins M; Ross EV; Uebelhoer NS
    Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):672-80. PubMed ID: 18318731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Split-face comparison between single-band and dual-band pulsed light technology for treatment of photodamage.
    Varughese N; Keller L; Goldberg DJ
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Aug; 18(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 27183026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intense pulsed light vs. long-pulsed dye laser treatment of telangiectasia after radiotherapy for breast cancer: a randomized split-lesion trial of two different treatments.
    Nymann P; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
    Br J Dermatol; 2009 Jun; 160(6):1237-41. PubMed ID: 19309367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial photo rejuvenation using two different intense pulsed light (IPL) wavelength bands.
    Bjerring P; Christiansen K; Troilius A; Dierickx C
    Lasers Surg Med; 2004; 34(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 15004823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unipolar versus bipolar radiofrequency treatment of rhytides and laxity using a mobile painless delivery method.
    Alexiades-Armenakas M; Dover JS; Arndt KA
    Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Sep; 40(7):446-53. PubMed ID: 18727024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of long- and short pulse alexandrite lasers compared with an intense pulsed light source for epilation: a study on 532 sites in 389 patients.
    Marayiannis KB; Vlachos SP; Savva MP; Kontoes PP
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2003 Dec; 5(3-4):140-5. PubMed ID: 14741816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intense pulsed light treatment of photoaged facial skin.
    Kligman DE; Zhen Y
    Dermatol Surg; 2004 Aug; 30(8):1085-90. PubMed ID: 15274697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Topical antioxidant application augments the effects of intense pulsed light therapy.
    Freedman BM
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2009 Dec; 8(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 19958428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.