530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17966308)
1. Measuring quality: an important tool in ensuring top notch home health care.
Waters RJ
Caring; 2007 Aug; 26(8):54, 56. PubMed ID: 17966308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Weak prospects. Federal Medicaid P4P proposal has skeptics.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(8):10. PubMed ID: 17348345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. MedPAC report pins payment system flaws on 'overvalued' services.
Med Health; 2006 Mar; 60(11):1, 4. PubMed ID: 16541671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assuring the quality of home care via the assessment of client outcomes.
Lalonde B
Caring; 1988 Jan; 7(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 10285207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicare's Home Health Pay-for-Performance demonstration: a preview.
Goldberg H
Caring; 2007 Apr; 26(4):28-9. PubMed ID: 17710938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quest for quality expands. With new pay rules, providers receptive to changes.
McKinney M
Mod Healthc; 2010 Aug; 40(31):10. PubMed ID: 20726078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hospitals must overcome physician resistance before P4P can take root.
Health Care Strateg Manage; 2006 Jul; 24(7):1, 14-6. PubMed ID: 16903396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dollars for quality?
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 2008 Oct; 104(10):35-9. PubMed ID: 19009461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. OBRA message is clear: quality or bust.
Nurs Health Care; 1988 Mar; 9(3):123-4. PubMed ID: 3352962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. My reimbursement insurance "policy".
Hohman C
Home Health J; 1987 May; 8(5):16. PubMed ID: 10301507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pay for performance and the hospital quality initiative.
Elliott B
Del Med J; 2005 Aug; 77(8):289-96. PubMed ID: 16184783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Home health care ... fastest growing segment of the health care industry.
Leavenworth G
State Health Care Am; 1995; ():51-5. PubMed ID: 10168074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Keeping high standards, caring traditions.
Halamandaris VJ
Caring; 2001 Mar; 20(3):44, 43. PubMed ID: 11255748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pay-for-performance: Medicare's new reimbursement twist.
Miller-Meeks M
Iowa Med; 2007; 97(1):8. PubMed ID: 17444298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Home health care agencies struggle with new federal rules.
Lumsdon K
Hospitals; 1991 Nov; 65(22):38, 40. PubMed ID: 1937447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study casts new doubt on effectiveness of P4P.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Aug; 14(8):88-9. PubMed ID: 17715880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality disconnect. Tools not ready for pay-for-performance: study.
Conn J
Mod Healthc; 2006 Dec 18-25; 36(50):8-9. PubMed ID: 17216707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Providers: more pay in P4P. CMS says higher incentive opportunities possible.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2008 Sep; 38(37):8-9. PubMed ID: 18810821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality connections. Financial rewards lead to better care, study says.
Loos R
Mod Healthc; 2005 May; 35(19):8-9. PubMed ID: 15929245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HCFA proposed CoP (conditions of participation) revisions.
Caring; 1997 Jun; 16(6):64. PubMed ID: 10169877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
