These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17967148)

  • 21. The feasibility and effectiveness of a web-based personalised feedback and social norms alcohol intervention in UK university students: a randomised control trial.
    Bewick BM; Trusler K; Mulhern B; Barkham M; Hill AJ
    Addict Behav; 2008 Sep; 33(9):1192-8. PubMed ID: 18554819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How 'sensible' is the UK Sensible Drinking message? Preliminary findings amongst newly matriculated female university students in Scotland.
    Gill J; O'May F
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2007 Mar; 29(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 17178753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A campus-based motivational enhancement group intervention reduces problematic drinking in freshmen male college students.
    LaBrie JW; Pedersen ER; Lamb TF; Quinlan T
    Addict Behav; 2007 May; 32(5):889-901. PubMed ID: 16876963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing prosocial message effectiveness: effects of message quality, production quality, and persuasiveness.
    Austin EW; Pinkleton B; Fujioka Y
    J Health Commun; 1999; 4(3):195-210. PubMed ID: 10977288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of two Web-based alcohol interventions for mandated college students.
    Doumas DM; McKinley LL; Book P
    J Subst Abuse Treat; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18657941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A close look at why one social norms campaign did not reduce student drinking.
    Thombs DL; Dotterer S; Olds RS; Sharp KE; Raub CG
    J Am Coll Health; 2004; 53(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 15495882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Overestimation of peer drinking: error of judgement or methodological artefact?
    Melson AJ; Davies JB; Martinus T
    Addiction; 2011 Jun; 106(6):1078-84. PubMed ID: 21306598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The relationship of parental reinforcement of media messages to college students' alcohol-related behaviors.
    Weintraub Austin E; Chen YJ
    J Health Commun; 2003; 8(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 12746039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Social networks and college drinking: probing processes of social influence and selection.
    Reifman A; Watson WK; McCourt A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Jun; 32(6):820-32. PubMed ID: 16648206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acceptance of Web-based personalized feedback: user ratings of an alcohol misuse prevention program targeting U.S. Marines.
    Simon-Arndt CM; Hurtado SL; Patriarca-Troyk LA
    Health Commun; 2006; 20(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 16813485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using personalized feedback to reduce alcohol use among hazardous drinking college students: the moderating effect of alcohol-related negative consequences.
    Palfai TP; Zisserson R; Saitz R
    Addict Behav; 2011 May; 36(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 21295919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fluid skills: drinking games and alcohol consumption among Australian university students.
    Polizzotto MN; Saw MM; Tjhung I; Chua EH; Stockwell TR
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2007 Sep; 26(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 17701509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Enhancing the effectiveness of antismoking messages via self-congruent appeals.
    Chang C
    Health Commun; 2009 Jan; 24(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19204856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Defensively biased responding to risk information among alcohol-using college students.
    Leffingwell TR; Neumann C; Leedy MJ; Babitzke AC
    Addict Behav; 2007 Jan; 32(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 16626881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cusp catastrophe model for binge drinking in a college population.
    Smerz KE; Guastello SJ
    Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2008 Apr; 12(2):205-24. PubMed ID: 18384717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Testing the effects of e-mailed personalized feedback on risky alcohol use among college students.
    Bryant ZE; Henslee AM; Correia CJ
    Addict Behav; 2013 Oct; 38(10):2563-7. PubMed ID: 23811059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Drinking and alcohol-related harm among New Zealand university students: findings from a national Web-based survey.
    Kypri K; Paschall MJ; Langley J; Baxter J; Cashell-Smith M; Bourdeau B
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Feb; 33(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 19032577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of Alcohol-Related Personalized Normative Feedback With and Without an Injunctive Message.
    Steers ML; Coffman AD; Wickham RE; Bryan JL; Caraway L; Neighbors C
    J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2016 Mar; 77(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 26997192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Persuasive communication about AIDS prevention: need for cognition determines the impact of message format.
    Bakker AB
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1999 Apr; 11(2):150-62. PubMed ID: 10214498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A qualitative study of college student responses to conflicting messages in advertising: anti-binge drinking public service announcements versus wine promotion health messages.
    Ahn HY; Wu L; Kelly S; Haley E
    Int J Public Health; 2011 Jun; 56(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 21120577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.