BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17967952)

  • 21. Determining a strategy for managing radioactive particles in the environment: establishing the BPEO.
    Love J; Morgan G; Dennis F; Liddiard M; Galson D
    J Radiol Prot; 2007 Sep; 27(3A):A129-41. PubMed ID: 17768313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Superficial groundwater contamination by artificial radionuclides by the nuclear site of Saluggia (Vercelli, Italy): radiological monitoring activities.
    Porzio L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):300-5. PubMed ID: 19850677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Calculated effects of backscattering on skin dosimetry for nuclear fuel fragments.
    Aydarous ASh
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 18223183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 90Sr migration to the geo-sphere from a waste burial in the Chernobyl exclusion zone.
    Dewiere L; Bugai D; Grenier C; Kashparov V; Ahamdach N
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 74(1-3):139-50. PubMed ID: 15063543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An Overview of 137Cs Contamination in a Southeastern Swamp Environment.
    Fledderman PD; Jannik GT; Paller MH
    Health Phys; 2007 Nov; 93(5 Suppl):S160-4. PubMed ID: 18049244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Model testing of radioactive contamination by 90Sr, 137Cs and 239,240Pu of water and bottom sediments in the Techa River (Southern Urals, Russia).
    Kryshev II; Boyer P; Monte L; Brittain JE; Dzyuba NN; Krylov AL; Kryshev AI; Nosov AV; Sanina KD; Zheleznyak MI
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Mar; 407(7):2349-60. PubMed ID: 19167743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Decommissioning of a nuclear power plant: determination of site-specific sorption coefficients for Co-60 and Cs-137.
    Delakowitz B; Meinrath G
    Isotopes Environ Health Stud; 1998; 34(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 10089594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Radioactivity levels in major French rivers: summary of monitoring chronicles acquired over the past thirty years and current status.
    Eyrolle F; Claval D; Gontier G; Antonelli C
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Jul; 10(7):800-11. PubMed ID: 18688446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characteristics of phytoplankton in Lake Karachay, a storage reservoir of medium-level radioactive waste.
    Atamanyuk NI; Osipov DI; Tryapitsina GA; Deryabina LV; Stukalov PM; Ivanov IA; Pryakhin EA
    Health Phys; 2012 Jul; 103(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 22647912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Extension of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for long term dose assessment of high level nuclear waste disposal sites to uncertainties in the human behaviour.
    Albrecht A; Miquel S
    J Environ Radioact; 2010 Jan; 101(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 19758732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Decommissioning procedures for an 11 MeV self-shielded medical cyclotron after 16 years of working time.
    Calandrino R; del Vecchio A; Savi A; Todde S; Griffoni V; Brambilla S; Parisi R; Simone G; Fazio F
    Health Phys; 2006 Jun; 90(6):588-96. PubMed ID: 16691108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An estimation method of the gross Beta activity in receiving river water of a nuclear power plant.
    Huang YJ; Tao YL; Zhang XF; Shang-Guan ZH
    Health Phys; 2010 Aug; 99 Suppl 2():S143-8. PubMed ID: 20622562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative radiological assessment of five European biosphere systems in the context of potential contamination of well water from the hypothetical disposal of radioactive waste.
    Olyslaegers G; Zeevaert T; Pinedo P; Simon I; Pröhl G; Kowe R; Chen Q; Mobbs S; Bergström U; Hallberg B; Katona T; Eged K; Kanyar B
    J Radiol Prot; 2005 Dec; 25(4):375-91. PubMed ID: 16340067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radionuclide tracing of water masses and processes in the water column and sediment in the Algerian Basin.
    Noureddine A; Benkrid M; Maoui R; Menacer M; Boudjenoun R; Kadi-hanifi M; Lee SH; Povinec PP
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Aug; 99(8):1224-32. PubMed ID: 18450344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of environmental radioactivity at uranium mining, processing and tailings management facility at Jaduguda, India.
    Tripathi RM; Sahoo SK; Jha VN; Khan AH; Puranik VD
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1666-70. PubMed ID: 18653352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is there a need for hydrological modelling in decision support systems for nuclear emergencies.
    Raskob W; Heling R; Zheleznyak M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):111-4. PubMed ID: 15238667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ambient environmental profile for the Savannah River Site.
    Rollins EM
    Health Phys; 2008 Jul; 95(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 18545030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conservatism in effective dose calculations for accident events involving fuel reprocessing waste tanks.
    Bevelacqua JJ
    Health Phys; 2011 Jul; 101(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 21617391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment study for multi-barrier system used in radioactive borate waste isolation based on Monte Carlo simulations.
    Bayoumi TA; Reda SM; Saleh HM
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2012 Jan; 70(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 21982736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dose rate distribution from a standard waste drum arrangement.
    Zoeger N; Brandl A
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101 Suppl 3():S142-7. PubMed ID: 21968820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.