These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17968047)

  • 1. A comparison of self-focus versus attentional explanations of choking.
    Wilson M; Chattington M; Marple-Horvat DE; Smith NC
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 29(4):439-56. PubMed ID: 17968047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of effort in moderating the anxiety-performance relationship: Testing the prediction of processing efficiency theory in simulated rally driving.
    Wilson M; Smith NC; Chattington M; Ford M; Marple-Horvat DE
    J Sports Sci; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1223-33. PubMed ID: 17176526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of effort in influencing the effect of anxiety on performance: testing the conflicting predictions of processing efficiency theory and the conscious processing hypothesis.
    Wilson M; Smith NC; Holmes PS
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 98(Pt 3):411-28. PubMed ID: 17705939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-consciousness and trait anxiety as predictors of choking in sport.
    Wang J; Marchant D; Morris T; Gibbs P
    J Sci Med Sport; 2004 Jun; 7(2):174-85. PubMed ID: 15362313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Event-related potential evidence for the processing efficiency theory.
    Murray NP; Janelle CM
    J Sports Sci; 2007 Jan; 25(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 17127591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure?
    Beilock SL; Carr TH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Dec; 130(4):701-25. PubMed ID: 11757876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adverse effects of anxiety on attentional control differ as a function of experience: A simulated driving study.
    Gotardi GC; Polastri PF; Schor P; Oudejans RRD; van der Kamp J; Savelsbergh GJP; Navarro M; Rodrigues ST
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():41-47. PubMed ID: 30487108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating stress as a challenge is associated with superior attentional control and motor skill performance: testing the predictions of the biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat.
    Vine SJ; Freeman P; Moore LJ; Chandra-Ramanan R; Wilson MR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Sep; 19(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 24059821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive trait anxiety, situational stress, and mental effort predict shifting efficiency: Implications for attentional control theory.
    Edwards EJ; Edwards MS; Lyvers M
    Emotion; 2015 Jun; 15(3):350-9. PubMed ID: 25642722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of music on mental effort and driving performance.
    Ünal AB; Steg L; Epstude K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Sep; 48():271-8. PubMed ID: 22664690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance.
    Chaparro A; Wood JM; Carberry T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):747-54. PubMed ID: 16127341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interrelationships between trait anxiety, situational stress and mental effort predict phonological processing efficiency, but not effectiveness.
    Edwards EJ; Edwards MS; Lyvers M
    Emotion; 2016 Aug; 16(5):634-46. PubMed ID: 27045685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional processes and choking under pressure.
    Schücker L; Hagemann N; Strauss B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Apr; 116(2):671-89. PubMed ID: 24032339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of platooning on signal-detection performance, workload, and stress: A driving simulator study.
    Heikoop DD; de Winter JCF; van Arem B; Stanton NA
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():116-127. PubMed ID: 28166869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commercial motor vehicle driving performance: An examination of attentional resources and control using a driving simulator.
    McManus B; Heaton K; Stavrinos D
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Jun; 23(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 28368189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conscious motor control impairs attentional processing efficiency during precision stepping.
    Ellmers TJ; Young WR
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():58-62. PubMed ID: 29715607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anxiety, anticipation and contextual information: A test of attentional control theory.
    Cocks AJ; Jackson RC; Bishop DT; Williams AM
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Sep; 30(6):1037-48. PubMed ID: 26211944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluctuating attentional demand in a simulated driving assessment: the roles of age and driving complexity.
    Stinchcombe A; Gagnon S; Zhang JJ; Montembeault P; Bedard M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):576-87. PubMed ID: 22133333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance.
    Matthews G; Desmond PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):659-86. PubMed ID: 12047065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.