These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17968599)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class V carious lesions: 5-year results.
    Demirci M; Sancakli HS; Uysal O
    Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Jun; 12(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 17968599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in class I cavities: 5-year results.
    Demircia M
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Dec; 9(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 18265712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in class V carious lesions: 3-year results.
    Demirci M; Ersev H; Topçubaşi M; Uçok M
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 16279721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
    Demirci M; Ersev H; Uçok M
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial.
    Türkün LS; Celik EU
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 19058687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Five-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities.
    Demirci M; Sancakli HS
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16555657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in Class I cavities: 3-year results.
    Demirci M; Uysal O
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):376-81. PubMed ID: 17212081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative clinical evaluation of different treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in Class III cavities: two-year results.
    Demirci M; Yildiz E; Uysal O
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18335727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite under different conditioning methods in primary teeth.
    Turgut MD; Tekçiçek M; Olmez S
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 15470873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.
    Folwaczny M; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Onal B; Pamir T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Nov; 136(11):1547-55. PubMed ID: 16329418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention and marginal adaptation of a compomer placed in non-stress-bearing areas used with the total-etch technique: a 3-year retrospective study.
    Prati C; Chersoni S; Cretti L; Montanari G
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Dec; 2(4):168-73. PubMed ID: 10388389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in Class III cavities: 5-year results.
    Demirci M; Ersev H; Sancakli HS; Topçubaşi M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 17073207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S; van Noort R
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.