506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17969138)
1. Numerical study of currents in workers induced by body-motion around high-ultrahigh field MRI magnets.
; Trakic A; Wang H; Liu F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1261-77. PubMed ID: 17969138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exposure of workers to pulsed gradients in MRI.
Crozier S; Wang H; Trakic A; Liu F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1236-54. PubMed ID: 17969133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments.
Fuentes MA; Trakic A; Wilson SJ; Crozier S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Apr; 55(4):1355-64. PubMed ID: 18390326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Numerical evaluation of the fields induced by body motion in or near high-field MRI scanners.
Crozier S; Liu F
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2005; 87(2-3):267-78. PubMed ID: 15556665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines.
Bahr A; Bolz T; Hennes C
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 17495652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of the female voxel phantom, NAOMI, and its application to calculations of induced current densities and electric fields from applied low frequency magnetic and electric fields.
Dimbylow P
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(6):1047-70. PubMed ID: 15798308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurements of occupational exposure to switched gradient and spatially-varying magnetic fields in areas adjacent to 1.5 T clinical MRI systems.
Riches SF; Collins DJ; Charles-Edwards GD; Shafford JC; Cole J; Keevil SF; Leach MO
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1346-52. PubMed ID: 17969176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Numerical field evaluation of healthcare workers when bending towards high-field MRI magnets.
Wang H; Trakic A; Liu F; Crozier S
Magn Reson Med; 2008 Feb; 59(2):410-22. PubMed ID: 18228572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients.
Glover PM; Bowtell R
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 18184992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.
Jokela K
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 17495653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A numerical evaluation of SAR distribution and temperature changes around a metallic plate in the head of a RF exposed worker.
McIntosh RL; Anderson V; McKenzie RJ
Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 Jul; 26(5):377-88. PubMed ID: 15924346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Different basic dosimetric quantities for the characterization of exposure to low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and the implication for practical exposure conditions and guidelines.
Martens L
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 17495651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occupational exposure measurements of static and pulsed gradient magnetic fields in the vicinity of MRI scanners.
Kännälä S; Toivo T; Alanko T; Jokela K
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2243-57. PubMed ID: 19293469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
van Rongen E; Saunders RD; van Deventer ET; Repacholi MH
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.
Roy CR; Martin LJ
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 17495666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FDTD calculations of specific energy absorption rate in a seated voxel model of the human body from 10 MHz to 3 GHz.
Findlay RP; Dimbylow PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2339-52. PubMed ID: 16625046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physiologic and dosimetric considerations for limiting electric fields induced in the body by movement in a static magnetic field.
Jokela K; Saunders RD
Health Phys; 2011 Jun; 100(6):641-53. PubMed ID: 22004933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resonance behaviour of whole-body averaged specific energy absorption rate (SAR) in the female voxel model, NAOMI.
Dimbylow P
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4053-63. PubMed ID: 16177529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Numerically-simulated induced electric field and current density within a human model located close to a z-gradient coil.
Li Y; Hand JW; Wills T; Hajnal JV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1286-95. PubMed ID: 17969144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current density in a model of a human body with a conductive implant exposed to ELF electric and magnetic fields.
Valic B; Gajsek P; Miklavcic D
Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Oct; 30(7):591-9. PubMed ID: 19418511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
