These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17969172)

  • 1. Safety of human MRI at static fields above the FDA 8 T guideline: sodium imaging at 9.4 T does not affect vital signs or cognitive ability.
    Atkinson IC; Renteria L; Burd H; Pliskin NH; Thulborn KR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1222-7. PubMed ID: 17969172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vital signs and cognitive function are not affected by 23-sodium and 17-oxygen magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain at 9.4 T.
    Atkinson IC; Sonstegaard R; Pliskin NH; Thulborn KR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 20578014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Static magnetic field effects on human subjects related to magnetic resonance imaging systems.
    Chakeres DW; de Vocht F
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2005; 87(2-3):255-65. PubMed ID: 15556664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of static magnetic fields on cognition, vital signs, and sensory perception: a meta-analysis.
    Heinrich A; Szostek A; Nees F; Meyer P; Semmler W; Flor H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Oct; 34(4):758-63. PubMed ID: 21751291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human MRI above the FDA 8 T guideline: can we conclude that it is safe?
    de Vocht F; Kromhout H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Apr; 27(4):938-9; author reply 939. PubMed ID: 18383255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Health effects of occupational exposure to static magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance imaging: a review].
    Franco G; Perduri R; Murolo A
    Med Lav; 2008; 99(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 18254536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurements.
    Chakeres DW; Kangarlu A; Boudoulas H; Young DC
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Sep; 18(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 12938131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exposure to high-field MRI does not affect cognitive function.
    Schlamann M; Voigt MA; Maderwald S; Bitz AK; Kraff O; Ladd SC; Ladd ME; Forsting M; Wilhelm H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1061-6. PubMed ID: 20432339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments.
    Fuentes MA; Trakic A; Wilson SJ; Crozier S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Apr; 55(4):1355-64. PubMed ID: 18390326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing department.
    de Vocht F; van Drooge H; Engels H; Kromhout H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Feb; 23(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 16374876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occupational exposure measurements of static and pulsed gradient magnetic fields in the vicinity of MRI scanners.
    Kännälä S; Toivo T; Alanko T; Jokela K
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2243-57. PubMed ID: 19293469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total antioxidant capacity, total oxidant status and oxidative stress index in the men exposed to 1.5 T static magnetic field.
    Sirmatel O; Sert C; Sirmatel F; Selek S; Yokus B
    Gen Physiol Biophys; 2007 Jun; 26(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 17660581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.
    Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MR safety at high magnetic fields.
    Schenck JF
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1998 Nov; 6(4):715-30. PubMed ID: 9799852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla on clonogenic ability, proliferation, and cell cycle in human embryonic lung fibroblasts.
    Schwenzer NF; Bantleon R; Maurer B; Kehlbach R; Herberts T; Claussen CD; Rodegerdts E
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Apr; 42(4):212-7. PubMed ID: 17351426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Possible mutagenic effects of magnetic fields].
    Teichmann EM; Hengstler JG; Schreiber WG; Akbari W; Georgi H; Hehn M; Schiffer I; Oesch F; Spiess HW; Thelen M
    Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):934-9. PubMed ID: 11142128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients.
    Glover PM; Bowtell R
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 18184992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of electromagnetic field exposure limits in Europe: is the future of interventional MRI safe?
    Hill DL; McLeish K; Keevil SF
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):1135-42. PubMed ID: 16099687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac pacemaker: in vitro assessment at 1.5 T.
    Shellock FG; Fieno DS; Thomson LJ; Talavage TM; Berman DS
    Am Heart J; 2006 Feb; 151(2):436-43. PubMed ID: 16442911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging and safety aspects.
    Coskun O
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2011 May; 27(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 21112927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.