BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

889 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17969286)

  • 1. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electron probe microanalysis of ion exchange of selected elements between dentine and adhesive restorative materials.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Jun; 52(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 17687959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Susceptibility of restorations and adjacent enamel/dentine to erosion under different salivary flow conditions.
    Alghilan MA; Cook NB; Platt JA; Eckert GJ; Hara AT
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1476-82. PubMed ID: 26476416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Koliniotou-Koubia ; Papagodiannis Y
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Tam LE; Chan GP; Yim D
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 9227122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glass ionomer cement inhibits secondary caries in an in vitro biofilm model.
    Krämer N; Schmidt M; Lücker S; Domann E; Frankenberger R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):1019-1031. PubMed ID: 28741172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Secondary caries formation with a two-species biofilm artificial mouth.
    Amend S; Frankenberger R; Lücker S; Domann E; Krämer N
    Dent Mater; 2018 May; 34(5):786-796. PubMed ID: 29544984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ion uptake into demineralized dentine from glass ionomer cement following pretreatment with silver fluoride and potassium iodide.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani
    Aust Dent J; 2006 Sep; 51(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 17037890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ion concentration adjacent to glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars.
    Bezerra AC; Novaes RC; Faber J; Frencken JE; Leal SC
    Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):e259-63. PubMed ID: 22999372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical effects of glass ionomer restorations on residual carious dentin in primary molars.
    Smales RJ; Ngo HC; Yip KH; Yu C
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 16158811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo vs in vitro anticariogenic behavior of glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Papagiannoulis L; Kakaboura A; Eliades G
    Dent Mater; 2002 Dec; 18(8):561-9. PubMed ID: 12385896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material on artificially demineralised dentine caries in vitro.
    Creanor SL; Awawdeh LA; Saunders WP; Foye RH; Gilmour WH
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):527-31. PubMed ID: 9699447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial secondary caries around two new F-containing restoratives.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Papadogiannis Y; Konstantinidis A
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 9573793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
    Donly KJ; Segura A
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.