These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1796943)

  • 1. Guidelines for medical technology in critical care. Technology Subcommittee of the Working Group on Critical Care, Ontario Ministry of Health.
    CMAJ; 1991 Jun; 144(12):1617-22. PubMed ID: 1796943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemodynamic monitoring: a technology assessment. Technology Subcommittee of the Working Group on Critical Care, Ontario Ministry of Health.
    CMAJ; 1991 Jul; 145(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 1860102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The assessment of technology in Ontario's critical care system. Technology Subcommittee of the Working Group on Critical Care, Ontario Ministry of Health.
    CMAJ; 1991 Jun; 144(12):1613-5. PubMed ID: 2054767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninvasive blood gas monitoring: a review for use in the adult critical care unit. Technology Subcommittee of the Working Group on Critical Care, Ontario Ministry of Health.
    CMAJ; 1992 Mar; 146(5):703-12. PubMed ID: 1562943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model for technology assessment applied to pulse oximetry. The Technology Assessment Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
    Crit Care Med; 1993 Apr; 21(4):615-24. PubMed ID: 8472583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality of health care, accreditation, and health technology assessment in Croatia: role of agency for quality and accreditation in health].
    Mittermayer R; Huić M; Mestrović J
    Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):425-34. PubMed ID: 21692267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A primer on the assessment of medical technologies.
    Matuszewski KA
    Pharm Pract Manag Q; 1997 Jan; 16(4):53-65. PubMed ID: 10164160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidelines for the transfer of critically ill patients. Guidelines Committee, American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Transfer Guidelines Task Force.
    Am J Crit Care; 1993 May; 2(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 8364669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of professional society guidelines and consensus conference statements in critical care.
    Sinuff T; Patel RV; Adhikari NK; Meade MO; Schünemann HJ; Cook DJ
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):1049-58. PubMed ID: 18379228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
    International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Experiences with and impact of health technology assessment on the German Standing Committee of physicians and patients].
    Gibis B; Rheinberger P
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2002 Feb; 96(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 11921610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments.
    Mokkink LB; Terwee CB; Knol DL; Stratford PW; Alonso J; Patrick DL; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jan; 6():2. PubMed ID: 16433905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditionally funded field evaluations and practical trial design within a health technology assessment framework.
    Bowen JM; Patterson LL; O'Reilly D; Hopkins RB; Blackhouse G; Burke N; Xie F; Tarride JE; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):324-31. PubMed ID: 19394573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical issues in pediatric emergency mass critical care.
    Antommaria AH; Powell T; Miller JE; Christian MD;
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2011 Nov; 12(6 Suppl):S163-8. PubMed ID: 22067926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A model for technology assessment as applied to closed loop infusion systems. Technology Assessment Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
    Jastremski M; Jastremski C; Shepherd M; Friedman V; Porembka D; Smith R; Gonzales E; Swedlow D; Belzberg H; Crass R
    Crit Care Med; 1995 Oct; 23(10):1745-55. PubMed ID: 7587242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health technology assessment in critical care.
    Scales DC; Laupacis A
    Intensive Care Med; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2183-91. PubMed ID: 17952404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A survey of charting in critical care units.
    Holt AA; Sibbald WJ; Calvin JE
    Crit Care Med; 1993 Jan; 21(1):144-50. PubMed ID: 8420721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.