These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
627 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17970250)
1. Scientific misconduct and breach of publication ethics: one editor's experience. Daroff RB Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 17970250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs; 2012 Feb; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22299799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Publication ethics: Its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2012 Jan; 24(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22243674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2012 Jan; 48(1):1. PubMed ID: 22188040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Preventing Publication of Falsified and Fabricated Data: Roles of Scientists, Editors, Reviewers, and Readers. Korte SM; van der Heyden MA J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 69(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 27851697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethics in forensic psychiatry publishing. Kapoor R; Young JL; Coleman JT; Norko MA; Griffith EE J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(3):332-41. PubMed ID: 21908749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How to Act When Research Misconduct Is Not Detected by Software but Revealed by the Author of the Plagiarized Article. Baydik OD; Gasparyan AY J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1508-10. PubMed ID: 27550475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Historical model for editor and Office of Research Integrity cooperation in handling allegations, investigation, and retraction in a contentious (Abbs) case of research misconduct. Price AR; Daroff RB Account Res; 2015; 22(2):63-80. PubMed ID: 25397599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dealing with charges of scientific misconduct. Galyean M J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1035. PubMed ID: 18417753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Publication ethics and scientific misconduct: the role of authors. Luther F J Orthod; 2008 Mar; 35(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18287388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings. Resnik DB; Dinse GE J Med Ethics; 2013 Jan; 39(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22942373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Journal of Pathology's approach to publication ethics and misconduct. Hall PA; Wixon J; Poulsom R J Pathol; 2011 Mar; 223(4):447-9. PubMed ID: 21294118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct encountered by APAME journals: an online survey. Looi LM; Wong LX; Koh CC Malays J Pathol; 2015 Dec; 37(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 26712665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct. Bosch X J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail. Couzin J; Unger K Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Ethical problems in scientific publications]. Reyes B H Rev Med Chil; 2018 Mar; 146(3):373-378. PubMed ID: 29999108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters. Farthing MJ BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The dark side of scientific research. McDonald JC Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 16772306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]