These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17970265)

  • 1. Applying the behavioral economics principle of unit price to DRO schedule thinning.
    Roane HS; Falcomata TS; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(3):529-34. PubMed ID: 17970265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of contingent and noncontingent attention on self-injury and self-restraint.
    Derby KM; Fisher WW; Piazza CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 8881350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude.
    DeGrandpre RJ; Bickel WK; Hughes JR; Layng MP; Badger G
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Nov; 60(3):641-66. PubMed ID: 8283154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of the reinforcement and extinction components in DRO contingencies with self-injury.
    Mazaleski JL; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Zarcone JR; Smith RG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 8331012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior.
    Vollmer TR; Iwata BA; Zarcone JR; Smith RG; Mazaleski JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 8473262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures.
    Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hanley GP; Hilker K; Derby KM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 8682733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of simultaneous and delayed reinforcement as treatments for food selectivity.
    Kern L; Marder TJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):243-6. PubMed ID: 8682740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The treatment of covert self-injury through contingencies on response products.
    Grace NC; Thompson R; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 8682739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects and side effects of DRO as treatment for self-injurious behavior.
    Cowdery GE; Iwata BA; Pace GM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 2074238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unit price and choice in a token-reinforcement context.
    Foster TA; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Jan; 81(1):5-25. PubMed ID: 15113130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of initial interval size on the efficacy of DRO schedules of reinforcement.
    Repp AC; Felce D; Barton LE
    Except Child; 1991; 57(5):417-25. PubMed ID: 2022233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction of multiple aberrant behaviors and concurrent development of self-care skills with differential reinforcement.
    Vollmer TR; Iwata BA; Smith RG; Rodgers TA
    Res Dev Disabil; 1992; 13(3):287-99. PubMed ID: 1626084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DRO contingencies: an analysis of variable-momentary schedules.
    Lindberg JS; Iwata BA; Kahng S; DeLeon IG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(2):123-35; quiz 135-6. PubMed ID: 10396766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Krug A
    Behav Modif; 2000 Jan; 24(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 10641365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. II. A unit-price analysis of cigarette smoking.
    Bickel WK; DeGrandpre RJ; Hughes JR; Higgins ST
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 2037824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extinction, DRO, and response-cost procedures for eliminating self-injurious behavior: a case study.
    Myers DV
    Behav Res Ther; 1975 Jun; 13(2-3):189-91. PubMed ID: 1164376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of reinforcer preference on functional analysis outcomes.
    Lalli JS; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 9532752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing pawing in horses using positive reinforcement.
    Fox AE; Belding DL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Dec; 48(4):936-40. PubMed ID: 26282112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Therapist- and self-monitored DRO contingencies as a treatment for the self-injurious skin picking of a young man with Asperger syndrome.
    Tiger JH; Fisher WW; Bouxsein KJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(2):315-9. PubMed ID: 19949518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.