These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17970265)

  • 21. A comparison of procedures for programming noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Kahng SW; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Wallace MD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 10885529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pigeons' demand and preference for specific and generalized conditioned reinforcers in a token economy.
    Tan L; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):296-314. PubMed ID: 26676183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Treatment and extended follow-up of chronic hand mouthing.
    Lockwood K; Williams DE
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1994 Jun; 25(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 7983228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.
    Piazza CC; Adelinis JD; Hanley GP; Goh HL; Delia MD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 10738949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Eliminating inappropriate classroom behavior using a DRO schedule: a preliminary study.
    Ramasamy R; Taylor RL; Ziegler EW
    Psychol Rep; 1996 Jun; 78(3 Pt 1):753-4. PubMed ID: 8711030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adventitious reinforcement during long-duration DRO exposure.
    Rey CN; Betz AM; Sleiman AA; Kuroda T; Podlesnik CA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1674-1687. PubMed ID: 32142174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of fixed momentary dro schedules under signaled and unsignaled arrangements.
    Hammond JL; Iwata BA; Fritz JN; Dempsey CM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2011; 44(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 21541110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The several roles of stimuli in token reinforcement.
    Bullock CE; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Mar; 103(2):269-87. PubMed ID: 25604188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Applying a DRO schedule and compliance training to reduce aggressive and self-injurious behavior in an autistic man: a case report.
    Wong SE; Floyd J; Innocent AJ; Woolsey JE
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1991 Dec; 22(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 1823666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of noncontingent delivery of high- and low-preference stimuli on attention-maintained destructive behavior.
    Fisher WW; O'Connor JT; Kurtz PF; DeLeon IG; Gotjen DL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 10738954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Noncontingent reinforcement: effects of satiation versus choice responding.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; DeLeon IG; Piazza CC; Kuhn DE; Rodriguez-Catter V; Adelinis JD
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(6):411-27. PubMed ID: 10641251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An analysis of reinforcer substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses.
    Shore BA; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Kahng S; Smith RG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):21-41. PubMed ID: 9103985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Second-order schedules of token reinforcement with pigeons: implications for unit price.
    Bullock CE; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jan; 85(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 16602378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reinforcement magnitude: an evaluation of preference and reinforcer efficacy.
    Trosclair-Lasserre NM; Lerman DC; Call NA; Addison LR; Kodak T
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):203-20. PubMed ID: 18595284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of concrete reinforcement to control content of verbal initiations in group therapy with adolescents.
    Zweback S
    Psychol Rep; 1976 Jun; 38(3 Pt 2):1051-7. PubMed ID: 935300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differential reinforcement of other behavior increases untargeted behavior.
    Jessel J; Borrero JC; Becraft JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):402-16. PubMed ID: 25913017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of differential reinforcement of other behavior during dyadic instruction to reduce stereotyped behavior of autistic students.
    Haring TG; Breen CG; Pitts-Conway V; Gaylord-Ross R
    Am J Ment Defic; 1986 May; 90(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 3717225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing the value of token reinforcement for individuals with autism.
    Fiske KE; Isenhower RW; Bamond MJ; Delmolino L; Sloman KN; LaRue RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 25930718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experimental analysis and treatment of multiply controlled self-injury.
    Smith RG; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Zarcone JR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 8331015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of a positive procedure to increase engagement on-task and decrease challenging behavior.
    Beare PL; Severson S; Brandt P
    Behav Modif; 2004 Jan; 28(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 14710706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.