These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17970417)

  • 41. The role of response-contingent incentives in lithium chloride-mediated suppression of an operant response.
    Meachum CL
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 May; 42(2):175-95. PubMed ID: 2164238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Discrimination of variable schedules is controlled by interresponse times proximal to reinforcement.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Nov; 98(3):341-54. PubMed ID: 23144509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Intranucleus accumbens amphetamine infusions enhance responding maintained by a stimulus complex paired with oral ethanol self-administration.
    Slawecki CJ; Samson HH; Chappell A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Dec; 58(4):1065-73. PubMed ID: 9408215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Early extinction effects following intermittent reinforcement: Little evidence of extinction bursts.
    Lattal KA; Kuroda T; Cook JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Jul; 114(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 32639050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The role of temporal intervals on reinforcer accumulation.
    French EJ; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Nov; 108(3):351-366. PubMed ID: 29068053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Tests of behavior momentum in simple and multiple schedules with rats and pigeons.
    Cohen SL; Riley DS; Weigle PA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Sep; 60(2):255-91. PubMed ID: 8409822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The generality of selective observing.
    Gaynor ST; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Mar; 77(2):171-87. PubMed ID: 11936250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement the outcome of an increase in overall activity or in operant responding?
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Nurnberger JT
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16475671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Serial spatial reversal learning in rats: comparison of instrumental and automaintenance procedures.
    Bushnell PJ; Stanton ME
    Physiol Behav; 1991 Dec; 50(6):1145-51. PubMed ID: 1798769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Naloxone administration impairs autoshaped learning.
    Messing RB; Allen SJ; Aanonsen L; Sparber SB
    Behav Neural Biol; 1989 Jan; 51(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 2705981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Drug discrimination in rats under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules.
    McMillan DE; Hardwick WC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jan; 73(1):103-20. PubMed ID: 10682343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
    Doughty AH; Richards JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Nucleus accumbens core lesions retard instrumental learning and performance with delayed reinforcement in the rat.
    Cardinal RN; Cheung TH
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 6():9. PubMed ID: 15691387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Response-reinforcer contiguity versus response-rate-reinforcer-rate covariance in rats' lever pressing: Support for a multiscale view.
    Baum WM; Aparicio CF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 May; 113(3):530-548. PubMed ID: 32215922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Increased generalization in a peak procedure after delayed reinforcement.
    Buriticá J; Alcalá E
    Behav Processes; 2019 Dec; 169():103978. PubMed ID: 31580905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Extinction and reacquisition of differential responding in rats trained to discriminate between chlordiazepoxide and saline.
    Rijnders HJ; Järbe TU; Slangen JL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1990; 102(3):404-10. PubMed ID: 2251337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessing the role of effort reduction in the reinforcing efficacy of timeout from avoidance.
    Galuska CM; Mikorski J; Perone M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Nov; 98(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 23144504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Stimulus change dis-habituates operant responding supported by water reinforcers.
    McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES; Wiediger RS
    Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 16112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: resistance to extinction.
    Shull RL; Gaynor ST; Grimes JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):211-31. PubMed ID: 12083677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.