389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17970999)
1. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (TonoVet) with the applanation tonometer (TonoPen XL) in normal Eurasian Eagle owls (Bubo bubo).
Jeong MB; Kim YJ; Yi NY; Park SA; Kim WT; Kim SE; Chae JM; Kim JT; Lee H; Seo KM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2007; 10(6):376-9. PubMed ID: 17970999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs.
Leiva M; Naranjo C; Peña MT
Vet Ophthalmol; 2006; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer (Tonovet) in clinically normal cat eyes.
Rusanen E; Florin M; Hässig M; Spiess BM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20149173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer.
Goldblum D; Kontiola AI; Mittag T; Chen B; Danias J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 240(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 12486518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using rebound (TonoVet
McDonald JE; Knollinger AM; Dustin Dees D; MacLaren NE
Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 20(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 27111099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a rebound and an applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in normal rabbits.
Pereira FQ; Bercht BS; Soares MG; da Mota MG; Pigatto JA
Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep; 14(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 21929609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements in dogs using two different tonometers and plano therapeutic soft contact lenses.
Ahn JT; Jeong MB; Park YW; Kim SE; Ahn JS; Lee YR; Lee ER; Seo K
Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 15 Suppl 1():83-8. PubMed ID: 22192568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of the TonoVet(®) rebound tonometer and the Tono-Pen Vet(®) applanation tonometer in dogs and cats with ocular disease: glaucoma or corneal pathology.
von Spiessen L; Karck J; Rohn K; Meyer-Lindenberg A
Vet Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 18(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 24131625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ophthalmic examination findings in a colony of Screech owls (Megascops asio).
Harris MC; Schorling JJ; Herring IP; Elvinger F; Bright PR; Pickett JP
Vet Ophthalmol; 2008; 11(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 18435661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure with the rebound tonometer and the applanation tonometer in normal dogs.
Park YW; Jeong MB; Kim TH; Ahn JS; Ahn JT; Park SA; Kim SE; Seo K
Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 14(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 21521440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical evaluation of the Tonovet® reboundtonometer in dogs and cats considering potential errors in handling].
von Spiessen L; Karck J; Rohn K; Meyer-Lindenberg A
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2013; 41(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 23958704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer in the measurement of intraocular pressure in dogs and cats.
Andrade SF; Cremonezi T; Zachi CA; Lonchiati CF; Amatuzzi JD; Sakamoto KP; Mello PA
Vet Ophthalmol; 2009; 12(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 19751486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Schirmer tear test type I readings and intraocular pressure values assessed by applanation tonometry (Tonopen® XL) in normal eyes of four European species of birds of prey.
Barsotti G; Briganti A; Spratte JR; Ceccherelli R; Breghi G
Vet Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 16(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 23173951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraocular pressure in American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) measured with rebound and applanation tonometry.
Cannizzo SA; Lewbart GA; Westermeyer HD
Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 20(6):526-532. PubMed ID: 28247466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a rebound tonometer with an applanation tonometer in dogs with glaucoma.
Slack JM; Stiles J; Moore GE
Vet Rec; 2012 Oct; 171(15):373. PubMed ID: 22915681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. TonoVet versus Tonopen in a high intraocular pressure monkey model.
Tu S; Li K; Ding X; Zuo C; Hu D; Ge J
Mol Vis; 2019; 25():391-399. PubMed ID: 31523117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs.
Görig C; Coenen RT; Stades FC; Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC; Boevé MH
Am J Vet Res; 2006 Jan; 67(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 16426223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
