522 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17971112)
1. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PCF; Queiroz EC; Araújo TC; Campos RE; Araújo CA; Soares CJ
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 17971112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restorative material and loading type influence on the biomechanical behavior of wedge shaped cervical lesions.
Pereira FA; Zeola LF; de Almeida Milito G; Reis BR; Pereira RD; Soares PV
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Apr; 20(3):433-41. PubMed ID: 26159778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of restorative techniques on fracture load of endodontically treated premolars.
Bianchi E Silva AA; Ghiggi PC; Mota EG; Borges GA; Burnett LH; Spohr AM
Stomatologija; 2013; 15(4):123-8. PubMed ID: 24589635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of two types of composite fibers on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an in vitro study.
Oskoee PA; Chaharom ME; Kimyai S; Oskoee JS; Varasteh S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 22186687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical weakening of devitalized teeth: three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis and prediction of tooth fracture.
Zelic K; Vukicevic A; Jovicic G; Aleksandrovic S; Filipovic N; Djuric M
Int Endod J; 2015 Sep; 48(9):850-63. PubMed ID: 25243348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of the post length and cusp coverage on the cycling and static load of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
Scotti N; Scansetti M; Rota R; Pera F; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):923-9. PubMed ID: 20830497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses.
Scotti N; Rota R; Scansetti M; Paolino DS; Chiandussi G; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 24095213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.
Yasa B; Arslan H; Yasa E; Akcay M; Hatirli H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
