These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17971274)

  • 1. Conditional mixed models with crossed random effects.
    Tibaldi FS; Verbeke G; Molenberghs G; Renard D; Van den Noortgate W; de Boeck P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):351-65. PubMed ID: 17971274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [How to fit and interpret multilevel models using SPSS].
    Pardo A; Ruiz MA; San Martín R
    Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):308-21. PubMed ID: 17425904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A general approach for two-stage analysis of multilevel clustered non-Gaussian data.
    Chervoneva I; Iglewicz B; Hyslop T
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):752-9. PubMed ID: 16984317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A case study on the choice, interpretation and checking of multilevel models for longitudinal binary outcomes.
    Carlin JB; Wolfe R; Brown CH; Gelman A
    Biostatistics; 2001 Dec; 2(4):397-416. PubMed ID: 12933632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalized latent variable models with non-linear effects.
    Rizopoulos D; Moustaki I
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):415-38. PubMed ID: 17535487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Random effects probit and logistic regression models for three-level data.
    Gibbons RD; Hedeker D
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1527-37. PubMed ID: 9423267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MCMC estimation for the p(2) network regression model with crossed random effects.
    Zijlstra BJ; van Duijn MA; Snijders TA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):143-66. PubMed ID: 19208289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixed model estimation methods for the Rasch model.
    Rijmen F; Tuerlinckx F; Meulders M; Smits DJ; Balázs K
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):273-88. PubMed ID: 15942071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linking classical test theory and two-level hierarchical linear models.
    Miyazaki Y; Skaggs G
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(4):344-56. PubMed ID: 19092229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginalized binary mixed-effects models with covariate-dependent random effects and likelihood inference.
    Wang Z; Louis TA
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):884-91. PubMed ID: 15606408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method of moments technique for fitting interaction effects in structural equation models.
    Wall MM; Amemiya Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):47-63. PubMed ID: 12803821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual level: a latent variable multilevel model.
    Croon MA; van Veldhoven MJ
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Mar; 12(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 17402811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Application of the pi* goodness-of-fit index to latent structure models].
    Revuelta J; Kessel D
    Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 17425905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variance component estimation for mixed model analysis of cDNA microarray data.
    Sarholz B; Piepho HP
    Biom J; 2008 Dec; 50(6):927-39. PubMed ID: 19035549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pseudolikelihood estimation of the Rasch model.
    Smit A; Kelderman H
    J Outcome Meas; 2000; 4(1):513-23. PubMed ID: 11272599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
    Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random-effects models for serial observations with binary response.
    Stiratelli R; Laird N; Ware JH
    Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):961-71. PubMed ID: 6534418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robust model fitting for the non linear structural equation model under normal theory.
    Xia YM; Song XY; Lee SY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):529-68. PubMed ID: 19040790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Monte Carlo EM algorithm for generalized linear mixed models with flexible random effects distribution.
    Chen J; Zhang D; Davidian M
    Biostatistics; 2002 Sep; 3(3):347-60. PubMed ID: 12933602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When can group level clustering be ignored? Multilevel models versus single-level models with sparse data.
    Clarke P
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2008 Aug; 62(8):752-8. PubMed ID: 18621963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.