328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17971688)
1. Peer nomination: a tool for identifying medical student exemplars in clinical competence and caring, evaluated at three medical schools.
McCormack WT; Lazarus C; Stern D; Small PA
Acad Med; 2007 Nov; 82(11):1033-9. PubMed ID: 17971688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does medical student membership in the gold humanism honor society influence selection for residency?
Rosenthal S; Howard B; Schlussel YR; Lazarus CJ; Wong JG; Moutier C; Savoia M; Trooskin S; Wagoner N
J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(6):308-13. PubMed ID: 20142126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can there be a single system for peer assessment of professionalism among medical students? A multi-institutional study.
Arnold L; Shue CK; Kalishman S; Prislin M; Pohl C; Pohl H; Stern DT
Acad Med; 2007 Jun; 82(6):578-86. PubMed ID: 17525545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer assessment of professional competence.
Dannefer EF; Henson LC; Bierer SB; Grady-Weliky TA; Meldrum S; Nofziger AC; Barclay C; Epstein RM
Med Educ; 2005 Jul; 39(7):713-22. PubMed ID: 15960792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students.
Lurie SJ; Nofziger AC; Meldrum S; Mooney C; Epstein RM
Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 40(11):1088-97. PubMed ID: 17054618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer evaluation in a clinical clerkship: students' attitudes, experiences, and correlations with traditional assessments.
Levine RE; Kelly PA; Karakoc T; Haidet P
Acad Psychiatry; 2007; 31(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 17242048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Associations of medical student personality and health/wellness characteristics with their medical school performance across the curriculum.
Haight SJ; Chibnall JT; Schindler DL; Slavin SJ
Acad Med; 2012 Apr; 87(4):476-85. PubMed ID: 22361792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is clinical competence perceived differently for student daily performance on the wards versus clerkship grading?
Wimmers PF; Kanter SL; Splinter TA; Schmidt HG
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):693-707. PubMed ID: 17690992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical preceptor evaluation of veterinary students in a distributed model of clinical education.
Fuentealba IC; Hecker KG
J Vet Med Educ; 2008; 35(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 19066356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer nominations as related to academic attainment, empathy, personality, and specialty interest.
Pohl CA; Hojat M; Arnold L
Acad Med; 2011 Jun; 86(6):747-51. PubMed ID: 21512365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sharpening the eye of the OSCE with critical action analysis.
Payne NJ; Bradley EB; Heald EB; Maughan KL; Michaelsen VE; Wang XQ; Corbett EC
Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10):900-5. PubMed ID: 18820517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is it appropriate to use core clerkship grades in the selection of residents?
Takayama H; Grinsell R; Brock D; Foy H; Pellegrini C; Horvath K
Curr Surg; 2006; 63(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 17084767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pilot study of a 'RIME'-based tool for giving feedback in a multi-specialty longitudinal clerkship.
DeWitt D; Carline J; Paauw D; Pangaro L
Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 42(12):1205-9. PubMed ID: 19120951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical school policies regarding struggling medical students during the internal medicine clerkships: results of a national survey.
Frellsen SL; Baker EA; Papp KK; Durning SJ
Acad Med; 2008 Sep; 83(9):876-81. PubMed ID: 18728448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Criteria for evaluating performance of third-year medical students.
Grim DR; Miller MD
Fam Med; 1993 Jun; 25(6):388-90. PubMed ID: 8349059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Not knowing that they do not know: self-assessment accuracy of third-year medical students.
Langendyk V
Med Educ; 2006 Feb; 40(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 16451246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Framework for feedback: the peer mini-clinical examination as a formative assessment tool.
Bennett D; Kelly M; O'Flynn S
Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):512. PubMed ID: 22515770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer-assessment of medical communication skills: the impact of students' personality, academic and social reputation on behavioural assessment.
Hulsman RL; Peters JF; Fabriek M
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Sep; 92(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 23916674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical resident peer evaluations-what have we learned.
Maker VK; Donnelly MB
J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 18308277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between peer assessment during medical school, dean's letter rankings, and ratings by internship directors.
Lurie SJ; Lambert DR; Nofziger AC; Epstein RM; Grady-Weliky TA
J Gen Intern Med; 2007 Jan; 22(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 17351836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
