BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17972407)

  • 1. N.Y. IPA gets nod from FTC.
    Robeznieks A
    Mod Healthc; 2007 Sep; 37(38):14. PubMed ID: 17972407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FTC and Justice Department find some IPAs go too far in bargaining.
    Jones JW
    Manag Care; 2003 Apr; 12(4):34-5. PubMed ID: 12747027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The FTC cracks down again. A New Mexico IPA is among the latest to run afoul of the law.
    Guglielmo WJ
    Med Econ; 2003 Oct; 80(19):21. PubMed ID: 14619300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learn from experience of IPA targeted in antitrust suit. Mesa County IPA prevailed, but making changes.
    Manag Care Strateg; 1998 May; 6(5):53-4. PubMed ID: 10181769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Will the big, bad antitrust wolf blow your IPA down?
    Pretzer M
    Med Econ; 1997 Apr; 74(7):40-4, 47. PubMed ID: 10165905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clip this guide on what triggers FTC investigation.
    Manag Care Strateg; 1998 May; 6(5):54-5. PubMed ID: 10181770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responding to an antitrust investigation. When the FTC calls, be sure to get an experienced lawyer, cooperate fully and don't be afraid to settle.
    Taylor M
    Mod Healthc; 2004 Nov; 34(45):S3. PubMed ID: 15560636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. IPA dissolves to settle charges of price-fixing.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1991 Oct; 21(40):26. PubMed ID: 10114172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The FTC hammer.
    Borges W
    Tex Med; 2002 Oct; 98(10):32-5. PubMed ID: 12391733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Docs lose in Texas. Ruling in FTC's favor not expected to alter IPA model.
    Taylor M
    Mod Healthc; 2004 Nov; 34(46):12. PubMed ID: 15609727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antitrust hammer.
    Ortolon K
    Tex Med; 1999 Feb; 95(2):48-50. PubMed ID: 10025180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FTC, DOJ issue statements on clinical integration.
    Capitation Manag Rep; 2004 Jan; 11(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 15055214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why the FTC gave these doctors a hard time.
    Azevedo D
    Med Econ; 1997 Sep; 74(18):146-8, 151-4, 156. PubMed ID: 10173560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FTC to doctors: price fixing won't fly. Interview by Wayne J Guglielmo.
    Brennan JW
    Med Econ; 2003 May; 80(9):85-6, 89. PubMed ID: 12776619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doctors win millions in a managed-care divorce.
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 1998 Feb; 75(4):56-62, 64, 67-8. PubMed ID: 10176960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physicians, beware of the 'iceberg' exclusivity clause.
    Lane W
    Manag Care; 1995 Nov; 4(11):40-2. PubMed ID: 10153301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical integration boosts quality, avoids antitrust scrutiny.
    Capitation Manag Rep; 2004 Jan; 11(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15002202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical integration model may offer new contracting option for IPAs, medical groups.
    Capitation Manag Rep; 2002 Aug; 9(8):116-9, 113. PubMed ID: 12233195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Settling all scores ... and opening the market. Kansas IPAs settle FTC price-fixing case.
    Taylor M
    Mod Healthc; 2006 Aug; 36(34):15. PubMed ID: 17009447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anti-trust implications of independent practice or associations.
    McIntire TJ
    Tenn Med; 2006 Jun; 99(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 16802660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.