These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17973344)

  • 21. Effect of the estrogen receptor locus on reproduction and production traits in four commercial pig lines.
    Short TH; Rothschild MF; Southwood OI; McLaren DG; de Vries A; van der Steen H; Eckardt GR; Tuggle CK; Helm J; Vaske DA; Mileham AJ; Plastow GS
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Dec; 75(12):3138-42. PubMed ID: 9419986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimizing selection on multiple identified quantitative trait loci in population with overlapping generations.
    Tang GQ; Li XW
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 May; 33(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 16722338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genetic parameters between slaughter pig efficiency and growth rate of different body tissues estimated by computed tomography in live boars of Landrace and Duroc.
    Gjerlaug-Enger E; Kongsro J; Odegård J; Aass L; Vangen O
    Animal; 2012 Jan; 6(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 22436149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marker assisted selection for the improvement of two antagonistic traits under mixed inheritance.
    Verrier E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 11268312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Ansari-Mahyari S; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Thomsen H; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1628-39. PubMed ID: 18349255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of different foreground and background selection methods in marker-assisted introgression.
    Bai JY; Zhang Q; Jia XP
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Dec; 33(12):1073-80. PubMed ID: 17185166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Animal model estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for litter size and weight, growth, and backfat in closed seedstock populations of large white and Landrace swine.
    Ferraz JB; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Apr; 71(4):850-8. PubMed ID: 8478287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Effect of population size of performance test on short-term selection result of sire line].
    Zhang H; Li JQ; Wang C; Liu XH; Chen YS
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 32(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 16078737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genome-wide association study of swine farrowing traits. Part II: Bayesian analysis of marker data.
    Schneider JF; Rempel LA; Snelling WM; Wiedmann RT; Nonneman DJ; Rohrer GA
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3360-7. PubMed ID: 22585800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle.
    Neuner S; Emmerling R; Thaller G; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4344-54. PubMed ID: 18946140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The use of marker-assisted selection in animal breeding and biotechnology.
    Williams JL
    Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):379-91. PubMed ID: 16110903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two-stage selection strategies utilizing marker-quantitative trait locus information and individual performance.
    Gomez-Raya L; Klemetsdal G
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):2008-18. PubMed ID: 10461975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons.
    Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2004; 82 E-Suppl():E313-328. PubMed ID: 15471812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimal selection on two quantitative trait loci with linkage.
    Dekkers JC; Chakraborty R; Moreau L
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(2):171-92. PubMed ID: 12081806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of three models to estimate breeding values for percentage of loin intramuscular fat in Duroc swine.
    Newcom DW; Baas TJ; Stalder KJ; Schwab CR
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Apr; 83(4):750-6. PubMed ID: 15753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Potential gain from optimizing multigeneration selection on an identified quantitative trait locus.
    Dekkers JC; Chakraborty R
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):2975-90. PubMed ID: 11811450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of the genomic prediction accuracy for feed efficiency traits in meat-type chickens.
    Liu T; Luo C; Wang J; Ma J; Shu D; Lund MS; Su G; Qu H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173620. PubMed ID: 28278209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense markers on Bos taurus autosome 14.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Mullaart E; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4821-9. PubMed ID: 17881705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The genetic correlation between feed conversion ratio and growth rate affects the design of a breeding program for more sustainable fish production.
    Besson M; Komen H; Rose G; Vandeputte M
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Feb; 52(1):5. PubMed ID: 32033525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.