These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17973344)

  • 41. Incorporation of discrete genotype effects for multiple genes into animal model evaluations when only a small fraction of the population has been genotyped.
    Baruch E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4365-71. PubMed ID: 18946142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Marker-assisted selection reduces expected inbreeding but can result in large effects of hitchhiking.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Jun; 127(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 20536636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Genomic selection for two traits in a maternal pig breeding scheme.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3079-87. PubMed ID: 23658351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sensitivity of methods for estimating breeding values using genetic markers to the number of QTL and distribution of QTL variance.
    Coster A; Bastiaansen JW; Calus MP; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Mar; 42(1):9. PubMed ID: 20302681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Quantitative trait loci mapping in an F2 Duroc x Pietrain resource population: I. Growth traits.
    Edwards DB; Ernst CW; Tempelman RJ; Rosa GJ; Raney NE; Hoge MD; Bates RO
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):241-53. PubMed ID: 17965327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle.
    Hayes BJ; Chamberlain AJ; McPartlan H; Macleod I; Sethuraman L; Goddard ME
    Genet Res; 2007 Aug; 89(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 18208627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Multivariate analysis of litter size for multiple parities with production traits in pigs: II. Response to selection for litter size and correlated response to production traits.
    Noguera JL; Varona L; Babot D; Estany J
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Oct; 80(10):2548-55. PubMed ID: 12413076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A dynamic deterministic model to optimize a multiple-trait selection scheme.
    Costard AD; Vitezica ZG; Moreno CR; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):885-94. PubMed ID: 19028846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Analysis of phenotypic- and Estimated Breeding Values (EBV) to dissect the genetic architecture of complex traits in a Scots pine three-generation pedigree design.
    Calleja-Rodriguez A; Li Z; Hallingbäck HR; Sillanpää MJ; Wu HX; Abrahamsson S; García-Gil MR
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Feb; 462():283-292. PubMed ID: 30423305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Impact of genetic selection on management of boar replacement.
    Robinson JA; Buhr MM
    Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 15626424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. From phenotyping towards breeding strategies: using in vivo indicator traits and genetic markers to improve meat quality in an endangered pig breed.
    Biermann AD; Yin T; König von Borstel UU; Rübesam K; Kuhn B; König S
    Animal; 2015 Jun; 9(6):919-27. PubMed ID: 25690016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Genetic and economic responses for within-family marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Spelman RJ; Garrick DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Nov; 81(11):2942-50. PubMed ID: 9839238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Results from six generations of selection for intramuscular fat in Duroc swine using real-time ultrasound. I. Direct and correlated phenotypic responses to selection.
    Schwab CR; Baas TJ; Stalder KJ; Nettleton D
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Sep; 87(9):2774-80. PubMed ID: 19502499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A method to optimize selection on multiple identified quantitative trait loci.
    Chakraborty R; Moreau L; Dekkers JC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(2):145-70. PubMed ID: 12081805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Results from six generations of selection for intramuscular fat in Duroc swine using real-time ultrasound. II. Genetic parameters and trends.
    Schwab CR; Baas TJ; Stalder KJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 19783704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Distribution and location of genetic effects for dairy traits.
    Cole JB; VanRaden PM; O'Connell JR; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jun; 92(6):2931-46. PubMed ID: 19448026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Genetic response from marker assisted selection in an outbred population for differing marker bracket sizes and with two identified quantitative trait loci.
    Spelman R; Bovenhuis H
    Genetics; 1998 Mar; 148(3):1389-96. PubMed ID: 9539451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
    Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.