These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17973721)

  • 1. In response to: Kahya E. (2006) A revision of a job evaluation system. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56(3), 314-324.
    Ransom E
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Dec; 60(5):570-1; author reply 572-3. PubMed ID: 17973721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A revision of a job evaluation system.
    Kahya E
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Nov; 56(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 17042810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Failed criteria: a verdict on the job evaluation document.
    Jacob D
    Nurs Times; 1977 Oct; 73(41):1579. PubMed ID: 928090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Logjam in the regions.
    Tattam A
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):43. PubMed ID: 2395711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pay and conditions.
    Dearmun A
    Nurs Stand; 2004 Oct 6-12; 19(4):29. PubMed ID: 15521413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A framework for your development.
    Nurs Times; 2006 Jul 18-24; 102(29):44. PubMed ID: 16895250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Every which way you lose.
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):42. PubMed ID: 2395710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of staff appraisal systems.
    de la Cour J
    Br J Nurs; 1992 May 14-27; 1(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 1617271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How should the government check nurses are fit to practise?
    Duffin C
    Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 26-Aug 1; 20(46):14-5. PubMed ID: 16898188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A guide to peer appraisal.
    Walker H; Joines M
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2004 Apr; 11(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 15119087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nurse appraisal in practice.
    Anderson G; Barnett J
    Health Serv J; 1986 Oct; 96(5023):1420-1. PubMed ID: 10279314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring down: PRP pitfalls.
    Kline R
    Health Visit; 1993 Jun; 66(6):222. PubMed ID: 8344838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Face up to doing the dreaded appraisals.
    Gulati S
    Nurs Times; 2012 Mar 13-19; 108(11):33. PubMed ID: 22536716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failing to make the grade.
    Pinel C
    Nursing (Lond); 1991 Jan 10-23; 4(26):32-3. PubMed ID: 1852307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rating nursing performance based on behaviors.
    Springer P; Payne K; Petermann B
    J Nurs Adm; 1998 Jan; 28(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 9451382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empowerment of nursing staff for optimal job performance.
    Huddleston D
    J Nurs Adm; 1999 Dec; 29(12):5, 16. PubMed ID: 10608932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Professional behavior. Evaluation and evolution methods for individuals. 1].
    Podkovyroff R; Baudet G; Gaba C
    Soins; 1991 Nov; (554):35-9. PubMed ID: 1767298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consistency checking (2).
    Adkins C
    Community Pract; 2006 Aug; 79(8):261. PubMed ID: 16922036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The external form of the employee performance appraisal].
    Schell W
    Kinderkrankenschwester; 1996 May; 15(5):199. PubMed ID: 8788561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of managing performance processes well.
    Duncan D
    Nurs N Z; 2007 Nov; 13(10):25. PubMed ID: 18084971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.