These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17973721)

  • 21. Making performance appraisal work.
    Noble JE
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Re: Does anyone care?
    RCM Midwives; 2004 Sep; 7(9):402. PubMed ID: 15739742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Appraisal: staff development tool or bureaucratic nightmare?
    Northcott N
    Sr Nurse; 1993; 13(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 8460296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale.
    Winstanley J
    Nurs Stand; 2000 Jan 26-Feb 1; 14(19):31-2. PubMed ID: 11209386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does your appraisal system measure up?
    Wilson P; Bodden JS
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 1999 Apr; 6(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 10382522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Staff appraisal: trying to do better.
    Walton M
    Nurs Times; 1985 Jul 10-16; 81(28):30-1. PubMed ID: 3848848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance management. Part 2: performance review and appraisal.
    Amann M
    AAOHN J; 1996 Aug; 44(8):421-2. PubMed ID: 8852241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing the job performance of nursing home staff.
    Sheridan JE; Fairchild TJ; Kaas M
    Nurs Res; 1983; 32(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 6551761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A competency-based approach to public health nursing performance appraisal.
    Kalb KB; Cherry NM; Kauzloric J; Brender A; Green K; Miyagawa L; Shinoda-Mettler A
    Public Health Nurs; 2006; 23(2):115-38. PubMed ID: 16684187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing nursing competency.
    Roman M
    Medsurg Nurs; 2005 Jun; 14(3):158-9. PubMed ID: 16035631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Taking liberties.
    Sadler C
    Nurs Times; 1990 Oct 24-30; 86(43):18. PubMed ID: 2235565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Professionalised educational appraisal and support for the struggling GP.
    Morison J; Irish B; Whiteman J
    Educ Prim Care; 2012 Nov; 23(6):374-7. PubMed ID: 23232126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Peer review--why and how to do it.
    Jackson SA
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Staff in state of 'heightened anxiety' over fitness to practise proposals.
    Nurs Stand; 2014 Apr; 28(32):14-5. PubMed ID: 24712598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Appraising the state of performance appraisal.
    Edmonstone J
    Health Manpow Manage; 1996; 22(6):9-13. PubMed ID: 10164227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Evaluation of coworkers. 1. The comparison with other coworkers is useful for all].
    Gremmel-Thomas E; Petrachi F
    Pflege Z; 1998 Mar; 51(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 9588340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The team wheel.
    Whyte L
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2007 Feb; 13(9):22-4. PubMed ID: 17338398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Who's fit to practise?
    Allen J; Dennis M
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2012 Apr; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 22662577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Individual performance review.
    Lilley R
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 1997 Jun; 4(3):20-1. PubMed ID: 9313574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Agenda for Change: job evaluation.
    Benton D
    Nurs Stand; 2003 May 21-27; 17(36):39-42. PubMed ID: 12836598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.