These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17973764)

  • 1. Doctor performance assessment in daily practise: does it help doctors or not? A systematic review.
    Overeem K; Faber MJ; Arah OA; Elwyn G; Lombarts KM; Wollersheim HC; Grol RP
    Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 41(11):1039-49. PubMed ID: 17973764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Doctors' health and fitness to practise: the need for a bespoke model of assessment.
    Harrison J
    Occup Med (Lond); 2008 Aug; 58(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 18676425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Doctors' health and fitness to practise: performance problems in doctors and cognitive impairments.
    Pitkanen M; Hurn J; Kopelman MD
    Occup Med (Lond); 2008 Aug; 58(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 18676426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review.
    Miller A; Archer J
    BMJ; 2010 Sep; 341():c5064. PubMed ID: 20870696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using a 'peer assessment questionnaire' in primary medical care.
    Elwyn G; Lewis M; Evans R; Hutchings H
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Sep; 55(518):690-5. PubMed ID: 16176736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reliability, validity, and feasibility of multisource feedback physician assessment: a systematic review.
    Donnon T; Al Ansari A; Al Alawi S; Violato C
    Acad Med; 2014 Mar; 89(3):511-6. PubMed ID: 24448051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current perspectives in assessment: the assessment of performance at work.
    Norcini JJ
    Med Educ; 2005 Sep; 39(9):880-9. PubMed ID: 16150027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: a systematic review of instruments and feedback methods.
    Evans RG; Edwards A; Evans S; Elwyn B; Elwyn G
    Fam Pract; 2007 Apr; 24(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 17264071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review.
    Kogan JR; Holmboe ES; Hauer KE
    JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(12):1316-26. PubMed ID: 19773567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.
    Buckley S; Coleman J; Davison I; Khan KS; Zamora J; Malick S; Morley D; Pollard D; Ashcroft T; Popovic C; Sayers J
    Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):282-98. PubMed ID: 19404891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: a systematic review.
    Ferguson J; Wakeling J; Bowie P
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 14():76. PubMed ID: 24725268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.
    Archer JC; McAvoy P
    Med Educ; 2011 Sep; 45(9):886-93. PubMed ID: 21848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Wright C; Richards SH; Hill JJ; Roberts MJ; Norman GR; Greco M; Taylor MR; Campbell JL
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23095930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians.
    Evans R; Elwyn G; Edwards A
    BMJ; 2004 May; 328(7450):1240. PubMed ID: 15155502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of voice rehabilitation on vocalisation in postlaryngectomy patients: a systematic review.
    Xi S
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2010 Dec; 8(4):256-8. PubMed ID: 21091891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
    McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Campbell JL; Richards SH; Dickens A; Greco M; Narayanan A; Brearley S
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multisource feedback to assess surgical practice: a systematic review.
    Al Khalifa K; Al Ansari A; Violato C; Donnon T
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(4):475-86. PubMed ID: 23725935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.
    Beard JD; Marriott J; Purdie H; Crossley J
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. PubMed ID: 21227024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability, validity and feasibility of quality of life instruments for adult patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy: result from a systematic review.
    Yip WK; Mordiffi SZ; Ang E
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2012 Mar; 10(1):27-52. PubMed ID: 22405415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.