132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17974107)
1. Multicenter retrospective analysis of wide-neck dental implants for single molar replacement.
Levine RA; Ganeles J; Jaffin RA; Clem DS; Beagle JR; Keller GW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 17974107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single molar replacement with a progressive thread design implant system: a retrospective clinical report.
Romanos GE; Nentwig GH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):831-6. PubMed ID: 11151582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the solid-screw ITI implant for posterior single-tooth replacements.
Levine RA; Clem D; Beagle J; Ganeles J; Johnson P; Solnit G; Keller GW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):550-6. PubMed ID: 12182298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter retrospective study of ITI implant-supported posterior partial prosthesis in Jordan.
Jebreen SE; Khraisat A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 17535332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of mandibular posterior single implants with two different surfaces: a 5-year comparative study.
Jung UW; Choi JY; Kim CS; Cho KS; Chai JK; Kim CK; Choi SH
J Periodontol; 2008 Oct; 79(10):1857-63. PubMed ID: 18834239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study.
Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Giovanni GF; Chiara CS; Scotti R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 18700371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception.
Pjetursson BE; Rast C; Brägger U; Schmidlin K; Zwahlen M; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 19486079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oral rehabilitation using Camlog screw-cylinder implants with a particle-blasted and acid-etched microstructured surface. Results from a prospective study with special consideration of short implants.
Strietzel FP; Reichart PA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 17590161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: a retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants.
Krennmair G; Schmidinger S; Waldenberger O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 11858577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous placement of implants--a 1-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.
Fermergård R; Astrand P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 18254742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: preliminary results at 6 or more months of loading.
Levine RA; Clem DS; Wilson TG; Higginbottom F; Saunders SL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 9109275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical analysis of wide-diameter frialit-2 implants.
Krennmair G; Waldenberger O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):710-5. PubMed ID: 15508987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of small-diameter implants in single-tooth and multiple-implant restorations: a 7-year retrospective study.
Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):703-9. PubMed ID: 15508986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary 3-dimensional surface texture measurement and early loading results with a microtextured implant surface.
Mazor Z; Cohen DK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):729-38. PubMed ID: 14579962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A retrospective analysis of patients referred for implant placement to a specialty clinic: indications, surgical procedures, and early failures.
Bornstein MM; Halbritter S; Harnisch H; Weber HP; Buser D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19216281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series.
Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
