BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17974120)

  • 1. A simplified method to assess precision of fit between framework and supporting implants: a preliminary study.
    Calderini A; Maiorana C; Garlini G; Abbondanza T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 17974120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible.
    Ortorp A; Jemt T; Bäck T; Jälevik T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 12737254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
    Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An alternative section method for casting and posterior laser welding of metallic frameworks for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    de Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mde G; Ribeiro RF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 19141050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Description and evaluation of a simplified method to achieve passive fit between cast titanium frameworks and implants.
    Helldén LB; Dérand T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 9581404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On titanium frameworks and alternative impression techniques in implant dentistry.
    Ortorp A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (169):3-88. PubMed ID: 15709359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants.
    Abduo J; Lyons K; Waddell N; Bennani V; Swain M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e20-9. PubMed ID: 21414138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The three-dimensional casting distortion of five implant-supported frameworks.
    Mitha T; Owen CP; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 19548406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modified section method for laser-welding of ill-fitting cp Ti and Ni-Cr alloy one-piece cast implant-supported frameworks.
    Tiossi R; Falcão-Filho H; Aguiar Júnior FA; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 20149062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of different tightening forces before laser welding to the implant/framework fit.
    da Silveira-Júnior CD; Neves FD; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Prado CJ; Simamoto-Júnior PC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 19210612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The precision of fit of milled titanium implant frameworks (I-Bridge) in the edentulous jaw.
    Eliasson A; Wennerberg A; Johansson A; Ortorp A; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 19076180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.
    Takahashi T; Gunne J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 12644800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving implant framework passive fit and accuracy through the use of verification stents and casts.
    Schneider A; Kurtzman GM; Silverstein LH
    J Dent Technol; 2001 Jun; 18(4):23-5. PubMed ID: 11933718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw.
    Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 10635187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
    Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photogrammetry--an alternative to conventional impressions in implant dentistry? A clinical pilot study.
    Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 10635208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry.
    Hjalmarsson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro investigation of marginal accuracy of implant-supported screw-retained partial dentures.
    Koke U; Wolf A; Lenz P; Gilde H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 May; 31(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 15140174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC; Herbst D
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.