These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17974646)

  • 1. Remaining challenges with Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Nov; 138(11):1487-9. PubMed ID: 17974646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overcoming obstacles to placing posterior direct resin restorations.
    Bertolotti RL
    Dent Today; 2000 Jul; 19(7):66-71. PubMed ID: 12524821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior composites: Update on cavities and filling techniques.
    Sabbagh J; McConnell RJ; McConnell MC
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():86-90. PubMed ID: 27889605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Curtis JW; Ergle JW; Rueggeberg FA; Adair SM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jan; 129(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 9448347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct posterior composites: a practical guide.
    Mackenzie L; Shortall AC; Burke FJ
    Dent Update; 2009 Mar; 36(2):71-2, 74-6, 79-80 passim. PubMed ID: 19388389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
    Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-quality evidence suggests that amalgam has increased longevity compared with resin-based composite in posterior restorations.
    Wong YJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Nov; 147(11):905-906. PubMed ID: 27793299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical evaluation of Class II composites placed using a decoupling technique.
    Wilson NH; Cowan AJ; Unterbrink G; Wilson MA; Crisp RJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 11317379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-year clinical evaluation of an amalgam adhesive.
    Belcher MA; Stewart GP
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Mar; 128(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 9066215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The enigma of dental amalgam.
    Leinfelder K
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 15259537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strength and clinical evaluation of a new dentinal bonding agent to amalgam and resin composite.
    Olmez A; Ulusu T
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):785-93. PubMed ID: 8628838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical study of adhesive amalgam in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML; Tylka JA; Sandrik J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Apr; 20(4):331-4, 336, 338 passim; quiz 344. PubMed ID: 11692340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Improved Glass Ionomer Restorative System: Stress-Bearing Class I and II Indications.
    Pitel ML
    Dent Today; 2017 Feb; 36(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 29235766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using a new condensable composite for posterior restorations.
    Poss SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (23):S14-8. PubMed ID: 12089754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
    Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.