766 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17974687)
1. Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses.
Ioannidis JP; Patsopoulos NA; Evangelou E
BMJ; 2007 Nov; 335(7626):914-6. PubMed ID: 17974687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses.
Engels EA; Schmid CH; Terrin N; Olkin I; Lau J
Stat Med; 2000 Jul; 19(13):1707-28. PubMed ID: 10861773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporating uncertainty regarding applicability of evidence from meta-analyses into clinical decision making.
Kriston L; Meister R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 24332396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Bayesian Power Analysis Procedure Considering Uncertainty in Effect Size Estimates from a Meta-analysis.
Du H; Wang L
Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 27485763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncertainty method improved on best-worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysis.
Gamble C; Hollis S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):579-88. PubMed ID: 15878471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty.
Eickhoff SB; Laird AR; Grefkes C; Wang LE; Zilles K; Fox PT
Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2907-26. PubMed ID: 19172646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The potential for meta-analysis to support decision analysis in ecology.
Mengersen K; MacNeil MA; Caley MJ
Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 26099478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses.
Mittlböck M; Heinzl H
Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4321-33. PubMed ID: 16991104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference.
Dahabreh IJ; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Schmid CH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():8-17. PubMed ID: 28063915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random-effects meta-analysis.
Knapp G; Biggerstaff BJ; Hartung J
Biom J; 2006 Apr; 48(2):271-85. PubMed ID: 16708778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploration of heterogeneity in distributed research network drug safety analyses.
Hansen RA; Zeng P; Ryan P; Gao J; Sonawane K; Teeter B; Westrich K; Dubois RW
Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 26052957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of Heterogeneity in Heart Failure-Related Meta-Analyses.
Khan MS; Li L; Yasmin F; Khan SU; Bajaj NS; Pandey A; Murad MH; Fonarow GC; Butler J; Vaduganathan M
Circ Heart Fail; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e007070. PubMed ID: 33131285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Heterogeneity in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses: its magnitude and implications.
Senior AM; Grueber CE; Kamiya T; Lagisz M; O'Dwyer K; Santos ES; Nakagawa S
Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3293-3299. PubMed ID: 27912008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analyses: what is heterogeneity?
Sedgwick P
BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1435. PubMed ID: 25778910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of credibility ceilings probes the robustness of meta-analyses of biomarkers and cancer risk.
Papatheodorou SI; Tsilidis KK; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 25433443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change.
Cornell JE; Mulrow CD; Localio R; Stack CB; Meibohm AR; Guallar E; Goodman SN
Ann Intern Med; 2014 Feb; 160(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 24727843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heterogeneity in meta-analyses. Comparing apples and oranges?
Choi SW; Lam DM
Anaesthesia; 2017 Apr; 72(4):532-534. PubMed ID: 28213890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of heterogeneity and effect size on the estimation of the optimal information size: analysis of recently published meta-analyses.
Garcia-Alamino JM; Bankhead C; Heneghan C; Pidduck N; Perera R
BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e015888. PubMed ID: 29122784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
