These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

766 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17974687)

  • 21. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayesian robustness in meta-analysis for studies with zero responses.
    Vázquez FJ; Moreno E; Negrín MA; Martel M
    Pharm Stat; 2016 May; 15(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 26913715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can meta-analyses be trusted?
    Thompson SG; Pocock SJ
    Lancet; 1991 Nov; 338(8775):1127-30. PubMed ID: 1682553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Getting more out of meta-analyses: a new approach to meta-analysis in light of unexplained heterogeneity.
    Saad A; Yekutieli D; Lev-Ran S; Gross R; Guyatt G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 107():101-106. PubMed ID: 30529650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of approximating or ignoring within-study covariances in multivariate meta-analyses.
    Ishak KJ; Platt RW; Joseph L; Hanley JA
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):670-86. PubMed ID: 17492826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve.
    van Aert RC; Wicherts JM; van Assen MA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):713-729. PubMed ID: 27694466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis.
    White IR; Thomas J
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16279136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistical Primer: heterogeneity, random- or fixed-effects model analyses?
    Barili F; Parolari A; Kappetein PA; Freemantle N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Sep; 27(3):317-321. PubMed ID: 29868857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A simple technique investigating baseline heterogeneity helped to eliminate potential bias in meta-analyses.
    Hicks A; Fairhurst C; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():55-62. PubMed ID: 29032245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Commentary: towards a definite coherent heterogeneity in meta-analyses.
    Genkinger JM; Terry MB
    Int J Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 43(4):1236-9. PubMed ID: 24997208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses.
    Furukawa TA; Watanabe N; Omori IM; Montori VM; Guyatt GH
    JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 17284696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis].
    Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
    Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression.
    Baker WL; White CM; Cappelleri JC; Kluger J; Coleman CI;
    Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Oct; 63(10):1426-34. PubMed ID: 19769699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measuring the statistical validity of summary meta-analysis and meta-regression results for use in clinical practice.
    Willis BH; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(21):3283-3301. PubMed ID: 28620945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictive distributions for between-study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta-analysis.
    Turner RM; Jackson D; Wei Y; Thompson SG; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):984-98. PubMed ID: 25475839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Label-invariant models for the analysis of meta-epidemiological data.
    Rhodes KM; Mawdsley D; Turner RM; Jones HE; Savović J; Higgins JPT
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 28929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comment on: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
    Coory MD
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):932; author reply 933. PubMed ID: 19349478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. HELOW: a program for testing extreme homogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Zintzaras E; Ioannidis JP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Nov; 117(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 25023534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.