These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17974880)

  • 1. The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
    Novak EJ; Silverstein MD; Bozic KJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Nov; 89(11):2389-97. PubMed ID: 17974880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty: a critical appraisal.
    Venkatesan M; Mahadevan D; Ashford RU
    J Knee Surg; 2013 Oct; 26(5):357-61. PubMed ID: 23512544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: A Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement.
    Dong H; Buxton M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 16571195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Navigation knee replacement.
    Dattani R; Patnaik S; Kantak A; Tselentakis G
    Int Orthop; 2009 Feb; 33(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 18958468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An economic model to evaluate cost-effectiveness of computer assisted knee replacement surgery in Norway.
    Gøthesen Ø; Slover J; Havelin L; Askildsen JE; Malchau H; Furnes O
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jul; 14():202. PubMed ID: 23829478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is restricted femoral navigation sufficient for accuracy of total knee arthroplasty?
    Zumstein MA; Frauchiger L; Wyss D; Hess R; Ballmer PM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Oct; 451():80-6. PubMed ID: 16691146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
    Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
    Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving outcomes in total knee arthroplasty-do navigation or customized implants have a role?
    Beal MD; Delagramaticas D; Fitz D
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 May; 11(1):60. PubMed ID: 27216272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods.
    Anderson KC; Buehler KC; Markel DC
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):132-8. PubMed ID: 16214014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation.
    Matziolis G; Krocker D; Weiss U; Tohtz S; Perka C
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Feb; 89(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 17272435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial.
    Zhang GQ; Chen JY; Chai W; Liu M; Wang Y
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1190-6. PubMed ID: 21776571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can Technology Assistance be Cost Effective in TKA? A Simulation-Based Analysis of a Risk-prioritized, Practice-specific Framework.
    Hickey MD; Masri BA; Hodgson AJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Jan; 481(1):157-173. PubMed ID: 36073992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of hospital volume on the economic value of computer navigation for total knee replacement.
    Slover JD; Tosteson AN; Bozic KJ; Rubash HE; Malchau H
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jul; 90(7):1492-500. PubMed ID: 18594098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty.
    Kim YH; Kim JS; Choi Y; Kwon OR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jan; 91(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 19122074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Morbidly Obese: A Computer Model-Based Evaluation.
    McLawhorn AS; Southren D; Wang YC; Marx RG; Dodwell ER
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(2):e6. PubMed ID: 26791039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
    Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Computer-assisted joint replacement surgery. Financial and clinical impact for a specialised orthopaedic hospital].
    König DP; Michael JW; Eysel P; Münnich U; Lichtenstein T; Schnurr C
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(6):669-74. PubMed ID: 20183743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Rotational alignment of femoral component with computed-assisted surgery (CAS) during total knee arthroplasty].
    Michaut M; Beaufils P; Galaud B; Abadie P; Boisrenoult P; Fallet L
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 18929753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience with computer-assisted navigation for total knee arthroplasty in a community setting.
    Carter RE; Rush PF; Smid JA; Smith WL
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):707-13. PubMed ID: 18534523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technology and cost-effectiveness in knee arthroplasty: computer navigation and robotics.
    Swank ML; Alkire M; Conditt M; Lonner JH
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Feb; 38(2 Suppl):32-6. PubMed ID: 19340382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.